New York 3D printer blocking technology mandate: Difference between revisions
Bolded important topics concerning the way the mandate was signed in and how it cannot work with offline printers. |
m Moved refs to inside quotes; misc. |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
The law responds to firearms that can be produced from digital design files on consumer additive-manufacturing hardware, including untraceable ghost guns and pistol-conversion devices that turn a semi-automatic handgun into a machine gun. Governor Hochul's office presented the budget measures as a response to illegal 3D-printed ghost guns and do-it-yourself machine guns, pairing the 3D-printer rules with new criminal penalties for digital gun files.<ref name="gov" /> The gun-safety group Everytown for Gun Safety characterized the package as shutting down what it called the ''"plastic pipeline"'' of do-it-yourself firearms.<ref name="everytown" /> | The law responds to firearms that can be produced from digital design files on consumer additive-manufacturing hardware, including untraceable ghost guns and pistol-conversion devices that turn a semi-automatic handgun into a machine gun. Governor Hochul's office presented the budget measures as a response to illegal 3D-printed ghost guns and do-it-yourself machine guns, pairing the 3D-printer rules with new criminal penalties for digital gun files.<ref name="gov" /> The gun-safety group Everytown for Gun Safety characterized the package as shutting down what it called the ''"plastic pipeline"'' of do-it-yourself firearms.<ref name="everytown" /> | ||
| Line 12: | Line 11: | ||
==What the law requires== | ==What the law requires== | ||
The operative command sits in the new General Business Law § 396-eeee (1): | The operative command sits in the new General Business Law § 396-eeee (1): | ||
<blockquote>''No person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation shall sell or deliver any three-dimensional printer in the state of New York unless such printer is equipped with blocking technology.'' | <blockquote>''No person, firm, partnership, association, or corporation shall sell or deliver any three-dimensional printer in the state of New York unless such printer is equipped with blocking technology.''<ref name="bill" /></blockquote> | ||
Executive Law § 837-aa (1)(b) defines that blocking technology as hardware, software, firmware, or other integrated measures that keep a printer from running any print job ''"unless the underlying three-dimensional printing file has been evaluated by a firearms blueprint detection algorithm and determined not to be a printing file that would produce a firearm or illegal firearm parts."''<ref name="bill" /> The detection algorithm itself is defined in § 837-aa (1)(c) as a software service that evaluates printing files, ''"whether in the form of stereolithography (STL) files or other computer aided design files or geometric code,"'' and flags any file that could produce a firearm or illegal firearm parts.<ref name="bill" /> | Executive Law § 837-aa (1)(b) defines that blocking technology as hardware, software, firmware, or other integrated measures that keep a printer from running any print job ''"unless the underlying three-dimensional printing file has been evaluated by a firearms blueprint detection algorithm and determined not to be a printing file that would produce a firearm or illegal firearm parts."''<ref name="bill" /> The detection algorithm itself is defined in § 837-aa (1)(c) as a software service that evaluates printing files, ''"whether in the form of stereolithography (STL) files or other computer aided design files or geometric code,"'' and flags any file that could produce a firearm or illegal firearm parts.<ref name="bill" /> | ||
| Line 24: | Line 22: | ||
==Implementation timeline== | ==Implementation timeline== | ||
The signing on May 27, 2026 did not switch on the device requirement. The § 837-aa working group and file-library provisions took effect on enactment, but the § 396-eeee sales prohibition is gated behind a chain of contingent steps and will not bind printer sellers for years.<ref name="bill" /><ref name="bill-pdf" /> | The signing on May 27, 2026 did not switch on the device requirement. The § 837-aa working group and file-library provisions took effect on enactment, but the § 396-eeee sales prohibition is gated behind a chain of contingent steps and will not bind printer sellers for years.<ref name="bill" /><ref name="bill-pdf" /> | ||
| Line 31: | Line 28: | ||
That chain can also stop entirely. The statute carries a feasibility escape hatch in § 837-aa (2): | That chain can also stop entirely. The statute carries a feasibility escape hatch in § 837-aa (2): | ||
<blockquote>''[I]f the working group determines that it is not technologically feasible to require three-dimensional printers sold in the state of New York to include blocking technology, the working group shall so report, and no regulations shall be required to be promulgated pursuant to this section, until such time as the working group determines that it is technologically feasible.'' | <blockquote>''[I]f the working group determines that it is not technologically feasible to require three-dimensional printers sold in the state of New York to include blocking technology, the working group shall so report, and no regulations shall be required to be promulgated pursuant to this section, until such time as the working group determines that it is technologically feasible.''<ref name="bill-pdf" /></blockquote> | ||
If the working group makes that finding, no rules issue and the sales requirement never takes effect, deferred indefinitely until a future finding of feasibility.<ref name="bill-pdf" /> | If the working group makes that finding, no rules issue and the sales requirement never takes effect, deferred indefinitely until a future finding of feasibility.<ref name="bill-pdf" /> | ||
==Scope and definitions== | ==Scope and definitions== | ||
The reach of the mandate turns on how broadly the statute defines a 3D printer. Penal Law § 265.00 (38), mirrored in Executive Law § 837-aa (1)(a), defines the term in two prongs: | The reach of the mandate turns on how broadly the statute defines a 3D printer. Penal Law § 265.00 (38), mirrored in Executive Law § 837-aa (1)(a), defines the term in two prongs: | ||
<blockquote>''"Three-dimensional printer" means: (a) any machine capable of rendering a three-dimensional object from a digital design file using additive manufacturing; or (b) any machine capable of making three-dimensional modifications to an object from a digital design file using subtractive manufacturing.'' | <blockquote>''"Three-dimensional printer" means: (a) any machine capable of rendering a three-dimensional object from a digital design file using additive manufacturing; or (b) any machine capable of making three-dimensional modifications to an object from a digital design file using subtractive manufacturing.''<ref name="bill" /></blockquote> | ||
The statute does not separately define ''"additive manufacturing,"'' ''"subtractive manufacturing,"'' or a CNC machine, and it contains no carve-out for machine size, intended purpose, or consumer use.<ref name="bill" /> Writing in Techdirt, Karl Bode argued that the law as drafted would reach open-source printer firmware projects such as Marlin, Klipper, and RepRap, offline office printers with no network connection, and CNC milling equipment.<ref name="techdirt" /> | The statute does not separately define ''"additive manufacturing,"'' ''"subtractive manufacturing,"'' or a CNC machine, and it contains no carve-out for machine size, intended purpose, or consumer use.<ref name="bill" /> Writing in Techdirt, Karl Bode argued that the law as drafted would reach open-source printer firmware projects such as Marlin, Klipper, and RepRap, offline office printers with no network connection, and CNC milling equipment.<ref name="techdirt" /> | ||
| Line 46: | Line 42: | ||
==Criminal provisions== | ==Criminal provisions== | ||
Subpart A adds new digital-file offenses to the Penal Law, alongside a new definition of ''"digital firearm manufacturing code"'' in § 265.00 (39) covering computer-aided design files or other code that can program a 3D printer or CNC milling machine to produce a firearm, ghost gun, unfinished frame or receiver, silencer, rapid-fire modification device, or major firearm component.<ref name="bill-pdf" /> | Subpart A adds new digital-file offenses to the Penal Law, alongside a new definition of ''"digital firearm manufacturing code"'' in § 265.00 (39) covering computer-aided design files or other code that can program a 3D printer or CNC milling machine to produce a firearm, ghost gun, unfinished frame or receiver, silencer, rapid-fire modification device, or major firearm component.<ref name="bill-pdf" /> | ||
| Line 54: | Line 49: | ||
==Technical feasibility criticism== | ==Technical feasibility criticism== | ||
The central technical objection is that no detection algorithm can reliably separate gun-part geometry from ordinary mechanical geometry. Phillip Torrone of Adafruit, whose critique Techdirt reproduced, argued that such a system would have to identify every possible firearm component from raw STL and G-code files without flagging the pipes, tubes, blocks, brackets, gears, and other common shapes that share geometric properties with gun parts, which he framed as a classification problem carrying high false-positive and false-negative rates.<ref name="techdirt" /> | The central technical objection is that no detection algorithm can reliably separate gun-part geometry from ordinary mechanical geometry. Phillip Torrone of Adafruit, whose critique Techdirt reproduced, argued that such a system would have to identify every possible firearm component from raw STL and G-code files without flagging the pipes, tubes, blocks, brackets, gears, and other common shapes that share geometric properties with gun parts, which he framed as a classification problem carrying high false-positive and false-negative rates.<ref name="techdirt" /> | ||
| Line 60: | Line 54: | ||
==Consumer-rights and surveillance concerns== | ==Consumer-rights and surveillance concerns== | ||
The consumer-rights objection is that the mandate puts a state-defined filter between owners and hardware they bought. The Electronic Frontier Foundation described print-blocking as ''"censorware,"'' software that it said ''"surveils every print,"'' and framed the requirement as surveillance of lawful printing carried out on the owner's own machine.<ref name="eff" /> | The consumer-rights objection is that the mandate puts a state-defined filter between owners and hardware they bought. The Electronic Frontier Foundation described print-blocking as ''"censorware,"'' software that it said ''"surveils every print,"'' and framed the requirement as surveillance of lawful printing carried out on the owner's own machine.<ref name="eff" /> | ||
| Line 66: | Line 59: | ||
==Comparison to other states== | ==Comparison to other states== | ||
New York's measure is one of several state efforts in 2026 to regulate 3D-printed firearms through the printer rather than only the file. Washington's House Bill 2321, titled ''"Requiring three-dimensional printers be equipped with certain blocking technologies,"'' would require printers sold in the state to carry blocking features tied to a firearms blueprint detection algorithm.<ref name="wa-bill" /> The bill was prefiled on January 8, 2026 and referred to the House Civil Rights & Judiciary Committee, where it remained as of June 1, 2026; it has not been enacted.<ref name="wa-bill" /> As reported by Tom's Hardware, the bill would prohibit sales after July 1, 2027 and set penalties as a class C felony carrying up to five years in prison and a $15,000 fine.<ref name="toms-wa" /> | New York's measure is one of several state efforts in 2026 to regulate 3D-printed firearms through the printer rather than only the file. Washington's House Bill 2321, titled ''"Requiring three-dimensional printers be equipped with certain blocking technologies,"'' would require printers sold in the state to carry blocking features tied to a firearms blueprint detection algorithm.<ref name="wa-bill" /> The bill was prefiled on January 8, 2026 and referred to the House Civil Rights & Judiciary Committee, where it remained as of June 1, 2026; it has not been enacted.<ref name="wa-bill" /> As reported by Tom's Hardware, the bill would prohibit sales after July 1, 2027 and set penalties as a class C felony carrying up to five years in prison and a $15,000 fine.<ref name="toms-wa" /> | ||
| Line 74: | Line 66: | ||
==Reactions== | ==Reactions== | ||
On the gun-safety side, the Governor's office presented the law as setting ''"first-in-the-nation minimum safety standards for 3D printers sold in New York to be equipped with basic technology that prevents the unlicensed, illegal production of lethal firearms and firearm parts,"'' and directed the Division of Criminal Justice Services to lead the expert task force.<ref name="gov" /> Everytown for Gun Safety praised the budget as nation-leading action against do-it-yourself machine guns and 3D-printed firearms.<ref name="everytown" /> | On the gun-safety side, the Governor's office presented the law as setting ''"first-in-the-nation minimum safety standards for 3D printers sold in New York to be equipped with basic technology that prevents the unlicensed, illegal production of lethal firearms and firearm parts,"'' and directed the Division of Criminal Justice Services to lead the expert task force.<ref name="gov" /> Everytown for Gun Safety praised the budget as nation-leading action against do-it-yourself machine guns and 3D-printed firearms.<ref name="everytown" /> | ||