User talk:Louis/Dragonfly Energy trade libel suit Will Prowse: Difference between revisions

Jackalgirl (talk | contribs)
Line 14: Line 14:


[[Special:Contributions/108.76.115.238|108.76.115.238]] 16:58, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
[[Special:Contributions/108.76.115.238|108.76.115.238]] 16:58, 8 June 2026 (UTC)
== UL Listed/Certified ==
I'm only doing a really cursory search, but I don't see any of the UL Listed or Certified marks on the battery (as imaged here on 8 June 2026: https://battlebornbatteries.com/products/100ah-12v-lifepo4-deep-cycle-battery -- I haven't fully read through the filing yet, but if they are claiming that the batteries are UL Listed, it's curious that the actual UL Listed mark doesn't appear to be on the battery (the BB10012 at least), and isn't showing up in the listing registry.
I *do* see a mark for LC -- the image is blurry, but it looks like the "c LC US" mark described here: https://labtestcert.com/marks-labels/
The ETL mark is covered here: https://www.intertek.com/product-certification-marks/etl/faq/
The "CE" mark indicates that the product is supposed to conform to European consumer standards (cite: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/CE_marking) which I'm suspecting it does not (but I am not a European battery safety expert).  Still, "...It is a criminal offence to affix a CE mark to a product that is not compliant or to offer such a product for sale."
The "UN38.3" mark has to do with the item being a lithium batter certified as being safe for transporation: https://www.intertek.com/batteries/un-38-3-testing/ [[User:Jackalgirl|Jackalgirl]] ([[User talk:Jackalgirl|talk]]) 22:33, 8 June 2026 (UTC)