ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
Line 15: Line 15:


The law cannot in any case to establish a statal monopoly over social communication media.
The law cannot in any case to establish a statal monopoly over social communication media.
}}
}}<ref>https://www.camara.cl/camara/doc/leyes_normas/constitucion.pdf</ref>


The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.
The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.


The possibility that a statal system is controlling the internet services to add age verification measurements, erodes consumer rights over a service they're paying for, restricting the control of the user over the service and their freedom to navigate the net.
The possibility that a statal system is controlling the internet services to add age verification measurements, erodes consumer rights over a service they're paying for, restricting the control of the user over the service and their freedom to navigate the net.


==Consumer response==
==Consumer response==