Safe Digital Environments Law: Difference between revisions

Line 11:

This legislation project might be incompatible with aspects from the Chilean constitution and the [[Net Neutrality Law]]

According to the Chapter III, Article 19, section 12 of the Chilean Politic Constitution of the Republic, that mentions constitutional rights and duties:

According to the Chapter III, Article 19, section 12 of the Chilean Politic Constitution of the Republic, that mentions constitutional rights and duties:<ref>https://www.camara.cl/camara/doc/leyes_normas/constitucion.pdf</ref>

{{Quote |12°. The freedom to emit opinion and informing, without previous censorship, in any form and in any media, without the prejudice to respond to crimes and abuse that are commited in the excercise of these liberties in conformity to the law, that must be qualified quorum.

The law cannot in any case to establish a statal monopoly over social communication media.

}}~~<ref>https://www.camara.cl/camara/doc/leyes_normas/constitucion.pdf</ref>~~

}}

The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.

@@ Line 11: / Line 11: @@
 This legislation project might be incompatible with aspects from the Chilean constitution and the [[Net Neutrality Law]]
-According to the Chapter III, Article 19, section 12 of the Chilean Politic Constitution of the Republic, that mentions constitutional rights and duties:
+According to the Chapter III, Article 19, section 12 of the Chilean Politic Constitution of the Republic, that mentions constitutional rights and duties:<ref>https://www.camara.cl/camara/doc/leyes_normas/constitucion.pdf</ref>
 {{Quote |12°. The freedom to emit opinion and informing, without previous censorship, in any form and in any media, without the prejudice to respond to crimes and abuse that are commited in the excercise of these liberties in conformity to the law, that must be qualified quorum.
 The law cannot in any case to establish a statal monopoly over social communication media.
-}}<ref>https://www.camara.cl/camara/doc/leyes_normas/constitucion.pdf</ref>
+}}
 The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.