ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
Line 19: Line 19:
The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.
The potential imposition of ClaveÚnica to the network services as the only method of age verification can be considered as a statal monopoly, and the prohibition of access to minors to access to social media can be considered as a form of censorship because it potentially can block minors or adults that do not want to verify to access to information in social media.


With the Net Neutrality Law, there's a conflict with the first dictated core principle of this legislation, that states network services or applications that offer connectivity or communication between users cannot arbitrarily block, interfere, discriminate, hinder, nor restrict the right of any Internet user to use, send, receive or offer any legal content through Internet, including any legal activity or usage done trough the network.


The imposition of a restriction without the user's petition is defined as an arbitrary form of block, interference or even a discrimination, as this only allows a certain group of people to access to certain content (in this case being social media).


==Consumer response==
==Consumer response==