Safe Digital Environments Law: Difference between revisions

Line 24:

With the Net Neutrality Law, there's a conflict with the first dictated core principle of this legislation, that states network services or applications that offer connectivity or communication between users cannot arbitrarily block, interfere, discriminate, hinder, nor restrict the right of any Internet user to use, send, receive or offer any legal content through Internet, including any legal activity or usage done trough the network.

The imposition of a restriction without the user's petition is defined as an arbitrary ~~form of block, interference or even a discrimination~~, as this ~~only allows a certain group~~ of ~~people~~ to access to ~~certain content (in this case being~~ social media).

The imposition of a restriction to access to social media without the user's petition is defined as arbitrary, and it does exactly what this law is prohibiting:

*Blocks and restricts the access of any user that is under the age of 16 or any adult that wants to access to social media but wants to keep their privacy and doesn't want to verify their age.

*It interferes and hinders the ability to access social media by applying a block that can be only removed by verifying or by finding any workaround.

*It discriminates, prohibiting the access to users under 16, any user who wants to keep their privacy and also elders or disabled people that might have difficulties to use the ClaveÚnica system.

==Experts & politicians response==

@@ Line 24: / Line 24: @@
 With the Net Neutrality Law, there's a conflict with the first dictated core principle of this legislation, that states network services or applications that offer connectivity or communication between users cannot arbitrarily block, interfere, discriminate, hinder, nor restrict the right of any Internet user to use, send, receive or offer any legal content through Internet, including any legal activity or usage done trough the network.
-The imposition of a restriction without the user's petition is defined as an arbitrary form of block, interference or even a discrimination, as this only allows a certain group of people to access to certain content (in this case being social media).
+The imposition of a restriction to access to social media without the user's petition is defined as arbitrary, and it does exactly what this law is prohibiting:
+*Blocks and restricts the access of any user that is under the age of 16 or any adult that wants to access to social media but wants to keep their privacy and doesn't want to verify their age.
+*It interferes and hinders the ability to access social media by applying a block that can be only removed by verifying or by finding any workaround.
+*It discriminates, prohibiting the access to users under 16, any user who wants to keep their privacy and also  elders or disabled people that might have difficulties to use the ClaveÚnica system.
 ==Experts & politicians response==