Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Pocket Cast: Reply |
CrookKilla (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 198: | Line 198: | ||
:Where is the current "Pro-consumer articles definition" or scope policy? | :Where is the current "Pro-consumer articles definition" or scope policy? | ||
:[[Positive_practices]] exist but doesn't answer. | :[[Positive_practices]] exist but doesn't answer. | ||
:Oh, see | :Oh, see [[Category:Pro-consumer_articles]] defines it and just got edited on the 15th. https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=Category:Pro-consumer_articles&diff=prev&oldid=57894 | ||
:@[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]], are you open to my idea? I'm reading into [[GrapheneOS]], [[Mullvad]] still being around that a proposal like mine is welcome - unlike some forums, where such a suggestion would be considered 'arguing with the mods'. [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 03:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC) | :@[[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]], are you open to my idea? I'm reading into [[GrapheneOS]], [[Mullvad]] still being around that a proposal like mine is welcome - unlike some forums, where such a suggestion would be considered 'arguing with the mods'. [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 03:26, 29 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
::I do think that if we were to continue down this route, we do seriously need to consider developing a set of proper criteria, as well as a necessary quality threshold, because only leaving it up to the whims of the bossmann just makes it difficult to sustain autonomy for the wiki [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 05:01, 29 June 2026 (UTC) | ::I do think that if we were to continue down this route, we do seriously need to consider developing a set of proper criteria, as well as a necessary quality threshold, because only leaving it up to the whims of the bossmann just makes it difficult to sustain autonomy for the wiki [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 05:01, 29 June 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::If we don't, we should add 'Such' before 'companies' in [[Category:Pro-consumer_articles]] ([https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Category:Pro-consumer_articles] ; Cat link no worky? not in preview.) . We could also blank a few of the counterexample pages, so editors can continue to '''see''' the content that was deemed inappropriate via diff link. An improvement to leaving them tagged as is or with a tag that says they serve as a counterexample. | |||
:::Should [[Policy]] or [[POL]] be a redirect to [[Consumer_Rights_Wiki:Wiki_policy_index]]? [[User:CrookKilla|CrookKilla]] ([[User talk:CrookKilla|talk]]) 14:18, 29 June 2026 (UTC) | |||
==Pocket Cast== | ==Pocket Cast== | ||