Brother Refresh EZ Print Subscription Service: Difference between revisions
m minor edits |
m added: brother user data, historical developments. fixed: grammar, accuracy and readability |
||
Line 182: | Line 182: | ||
*monochrome printing now makes '''up to 80% of total print jobs''' in a home or small office environment. <ref name=":0" /> | *monochrome printing now makes '''up to 80% of total print jobs''' in a home or small office environment. <ref name=":0" /> | ||
*color printing has '''decreased in use by 34%''' over the 3 year period measured. <ref name=":0" /> | *color printing has '''decreased in use by 34%''' over the 3 year period measured. <ref name=":0" /> | ||
By comparing the user data against the claim of cost-savings and stipulations in methodology from Brother, it is clear the scenario is one in which the choice given by Brother in no way matches a real-world situation or printing habits of the user. Furthermore, Brother engages in a purposefully misleading comparison when they state that the saving is based upon ''"average cost per page of eligible like standard capacity cartridge"'' for they must compare identical products as only genuine Brother cartridges are supplied in the program. | By comparing the user data against the claim of cost-savings and stipulations in methodology from Brother, it is clear the scenario is one in which the choice given by Brother in '''no way matches a real-world situation or printing habits of the user'''.<ref>[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/images/0/0a/Brother_FY2012_New_Product_Lines.png]</ref> Furthermore, Brother engages in a purposefully misleading comparison when they state that the saving is based upon ''"average cost per page of eligible like standard capacity cartridge"'' for they must compare identical products as only genuine Brother cartridges are supplied in the program. | ||
======Assumptions====== | ======Assumptions====== | ||
Line 304: | Line 304: | ||
======Brother Industries, Ltd.====== | ======Brother Industries, Ltd.====== | ||
Brother was established in Japan in 1908 <ref>[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/images/a/a9/Brother_Sales_Revenue_1928-2020.png Brother Sales Revenue (1928-2020).png]</ref> primarily as an industrial manufacturer of machine parts. It was not until 1928 that Brother launched its first mainline product: | Brother was established in Japan in 1908 <ref>[https://wiki.rossmanngroup.com/images/a/a9/Brother_Sales_Revenue_1928-2020.png Brother Sales Revenue (1928-2020).png]</ref> primarily as an industrial manufacturer of machine parts. It was not until 1928 that Brother launched its first mainline product: head-wear specific industrial sewing machine. Owing to their history in manufacturing, Brother's machines were good quality and highly regarded. They sold well and prior to the second-world war, Japanese companies like Brother had access to a highly-skilled and low-cost labor force. This allowed Brother to expand its product line and to firmly capture a share of the industrial sewing category; a market in which they still operate today. | ||
The post war years saw significant Japanese government focus on industrialization.<ref>Mosk, Carl (August 12, 2023) [https://eh.net/encyclopedia/japanese-industrialization-and-economic-growth/ "Japanese Industrialization and Economic Growth"] Economic History Association. Retrieved February 8, 2025</ref> And by the early 1960's and 1970's, Japan's electronics manufacturing sector was not only mature but had rapidly expanded. | The post war years saw significant Japanese government focus on industrialization.<ref>Mosk, Carl (August 12, 2023) [https://eh.net/encyclopedia/japanese-industrialization-and-economic-growth/ "Japanese Industrialization and Economic Growth"] Economic History Association. Retrieved February 8, 2025</ref> And by the early 1960's and 1970's, Japan's electronics manufacturing sector was not only mature but had rapidly expanded. Facts such as a large national labor pool, new access to western technology and the skill-to-cost benefits from earlier government investment, quickly made Japanese manufacturers the leaders in high-quality, low-cost electronic products. Brother too, benefited from this economic environment. It invested heavily in the technology sector and by 1971, released a product that would change the company direction and growth into the foreseeable future: a high-speed, '''dot-matrix printer'''. | ||
======Segment Reliance====== | ======Segment Reliance====== | ||
Into the '''1990's''', Brother identified its Printing & Solutions ('''P&S''') segment as a global category for growth and shifted significant resources firmly towards this market. And while it maintained its leadership in core categories such as industrial sewing, machine tools and parts, the company continued to make further gains through P&S and in electronic products such as labeling. The returns in these segments continued to provide Brother opportunities for expansion. They developed product lines that took advantage of this demand, not only through industrial buyers to whom Brother traditionally catered, but with small office and home office users ('''SOHO''') who began to purchase Brother's products for their high reliability and reasonable cost. By the mid-1990's Brother had a mature and robust printing portfolio and had released many successful and profitable lines: | |||
* laser printers (both color & mono) | *laser printers (both color & mono) | ||
* all-in-one printers (print, fax & scan) | *all-in-one printers (print, fax & scan) | ||
* inkjet printers (high-speed color) | *inkjet printers (high-speed color) | ||
* garment, label and mobile printers. | *garment, label and mobile printers. | ||
Throughout the late 1990's and early '''2000's''' the company continued to focus | Throughout the late 1990's and early '''2000's''' the company continued to focus within the P&S segment and invested in long-term channel relationships. Now an establish brand, Brother's sales and profitability was firmly tied to the '''<nowiki/>'parts and consumables'''<nowiki/>' market. Brother understood that its clients such as OEM, vendors, distributors and large retailers were key to maintaining a strong brand affiliation to further drive this demand. To acquire new industrial and SOHO buyers, Brother engaged in heavy promotional schedules and further product offerings. It introduced high-end, all-in-one laser printers and high-speed inkjet printers, all at price points not before seen in the market. Brother also sought growth in emerging countries. The company invested aggressively in Asia by promoting and selling low-cost '''monochrome laser printers''', which by now had became their strength and specialty. | ||
[[File:Brother FY2012 New Product Lines.png|frameless|699x699px]] | |||
Then into the '''2010's''' Brother's previously positive financial results started to plateau. Its operating income and profits fell, and net sales, though marginally up, had failed to meet forecast. Furthermore, its Printing & Solutions ('''P&S''') segment had not shown the growth expected, especially in Asia where they had invested heavily. Still, Brother's strategy remained largely the same: | Then into the '''2010's''' Brother's previously positive financial results started to plateau. Its operating income and profits fell, and net sales, though marginally up, had failed to meet forecast. Furthermore, its Printing & Solutions ('''P&S''') segment had not shown the growth expected, especially in Asia where they had invested heavily. Still, Brother's strategy remained largely the same: | ||
Line 324: | Line 326: | ||
#Target sales channels and support promotions to '''expand sales of mono laser printers''' in emerging markets. | #Target sales channels and support promotions to '''expand sales of mono laser printers''' in emerging markets. | ||
But by '''2015''' investors and shareholders had started to ask some tough questions. Despite meeting net sales forecast targets in Printing & Solutions (up by 5.5% YOY), income and profit were in significant decline, The previously stable Machinery & Solution division was in free-fall and the anchor for sales and growth, Printing & Solutions ('''P&S'''), suffered a 4.3% profit contraction. | But by '''2015''' investors and shareholders had started to ask some tough questions. Despite meeting net sales forecast targets in Printing & Solutions (up by 5.5% YOY), company wide income and profit were in significant decline, The previously stable Machinery & Solution division was in free-fall and the anchor for sales and growth, Printing & Solutions ('''P&S'''), suffered a 4.3% profit contraction. Brother | ||