Consumer Rights Wiki:Moderator guidelines: Difference between revisions
m center table |
m add section on merge and deletion requests |
||
| Line 132: | Line 132: | ||
*The citing of sources for opinion or commentary should present a balanced and rational view, without giving undue weight to fringe opinions. | *The citing of sources for opinion or commentary should present a balanced and rational view, without giving undue weight to fringe opinions. | ||
====F. User provided insights:==== | |||
Users can use the request templates <code>DeletionRequest</code> ([[Template:DeletionRequest| deletion request template page]]) and <code>MergeRequest</code> [[Template:MergeRequest| merge request template page]]) to indicate pages that may need attention. Look through the [[:Category:Articles with merge requests|Articles with merge requests]] and [[:Category:Articles with deletion requests|Articles with deletion requests]] categories ( both in the [[:Category:Todo| todo]] category) in order to look though these requests. | |||
If a deletion request is determined to be valid the linked pages need to be handled and after that the page should be marked with the <code>{{Garbage}}</code> temlpate and protected from edits pending final deletion. | |||
In cases of merge requests once things might not pe as simple. After moving content to the page that is to be retained the page [[Special:MergeHistory]] should be used in order to maintain the edit history and contributors. This might become complicated if multiple pages are to be merged so going through them 2 at the time should probably be the way this is handles even if it results in some inefficiencies. After merging articles the redundant pages should be marked with the <code>{{Garbage}}</code> and protected from edits pending deletion. | |||
==Example application of rules== | ==Example application of rules== | ||