User talk:Kyliotic: Difference between revisions

Line 25:

::*Maybe even some automation to automatically generate extension metadata (likely only possible with a MediaWiki extension)

::*Does Cargo achieve those points? I genuinely don't know, but just some things to consider. [[User:Kyliotic|Kyliotic]] ([[User talk:Kyliotic|talk]]) 06:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

:::@[[User:Kyliotic|Kyliotic]]<nowiki> this time the ping worked. Maybe I missed it last time or I had the page open in another tab and that messed it up. You should take a look at the page I linked, I think it will help (eg ~~~~ automatically signs mesaages for you) I am aware how you are replying, I wrote the FAQ entry on it a month ago. Actually disregard the source editor stuff, let me just confirm your account ao you can just skip the captchas and reply using the ui.</nowiki>

:::* The metadata used with Cargo/Semantic media wiki is meant to be used like you descibe by the extension. Also they will be user editable as well.

:::* The clinton cat extension did initially work like you describe(querries to the api for every page) but that has shifted. I would suggest working with them as they have a basic ui (as I understand it), there are a couple of people already working on it and it has been the one Louis has been linking. Work has been stalled for a bit (mainly waiting on the extension to be added) but I think combining resources would help here. Maybe make a PR to share your idea on what the metadata format should contain? Or even the whole flow you currently use.

:::* Automating this is how we are planning to do it. It should be possible through the API and a scriot but I dont have anything concrete yet.

:::Also if you join the discrors communication would probably be easier. If you prefer not to I am happy to use talk pages and using github for the extension should also be fine, but it would help get on the same page faster I think. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 09:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)

@@ Line 25: / Line 25: @@
 ::*Maybe even some automation to automatically generate extension metadata (likely only possible with a MediaWiki extension)
 ::*Does Cargo achieve those points? I genuinely  don't  know, but just some things to consider. [[User:Kyliotic|Kyliotic]] ([[User talk:Kyliotic|talk]]) 06:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
+:::@[[User:Kyliotic|Kyliotic]]<nowiki> this time the ping worked. Maybe I missed it last time or I had the page open in another tab and that messed it up. You should take a look at the page I linked, I think it will help (eg ~~~~ automatically signs mesaages for you) I am aware how you are replying, I wrote the FAQ entry on it a month ago. Actually disregard the source editor stuff, let me just confirm your account ao you can just skip the captchas and reply using the ui.</nowiki>
+:::* The metadata used with Cargo/Semantic media wiki is meant to be used like you descibe by the extension. Also they will be user editable as well.
+:::* The clinton cat extension did initially work like you describe(querries to the api for every page) but that has shifted. I would suggest working with them as they have a basic ui (as I understand it), there are a couple of people already working on it and it has been the one Louis has been linking. Work has been stalled for a bit (mainly waiting on the extension to be added) but I think combining resources would help here. Maybe make a PR to share your idea on what the metadata format should contain? Or even the whole flow you currently use.
+:::* Automating this is how we are planning to do it. It should be possible through the API and a scriot but I dont have anything concrete yet.
+:::Also if you join the discrors communication would probably be easier. If you prefer not to I am happy to use talk pages and using github for the extension should also be fine, but it would help get on the same page faster I think.  [[User:Kostas|Kostas]] ([[User talk:Kostas|talk]]) 09:04, 4 March 2025 (UTC)