Talk:Amazon: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 14:37, 16 January 2025

Heads up, when I was working on listing some of the controversies Amazon has been in charge of, I did lump together controversies that happened before 2024, if there's anything particularly egregious, or should be merged in, please feel free to do so! JamesTDG (talk) 09:39, 15 January 2025 (UTC)Reply

Worker's rights and this wiki

The brief mention of workers currently present in the overview of Amazon is fine as context for the company, but I just wanted to pre-empt potential issues and reiterate that this Wiki is not the place to discuss employee rights issues (or wider social/environmental issues for that matter). Nothing wrong with discussing them in general, and they are very important, just that featuring them here would represent a substantial expansion of the wiki's scope, and it is not something we aim to achieve.

  -Keith

Revision as of 14:36, 16 January 2025 edit Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 431 edits →Worker's rights and this wiki: new section ← Older edit		Revision as of 14:37, 16 January 2025 edit undo Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 431 edits →Worker's rights and this wiki Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:

	The brief mention of workers currently present in the overview of Amazon is fine as context for the company, but I just wanted to pre-empt potential issues and reiterate that this Wiki is not the place to discuss employee rights issues (or wider social/environmental issues for that matter). Nothing wrong with discussing them in general, and they are very important, just that featuring them here would represent a substantial expansion of the wiki's scope, and it is not something we aim to achieve.		The brief mention of workers currently present in the overview of Amazon is fine as context for the company, but I just wanted to pre-empt potential issues and reiterate that this Wiki is not the place to discuss employee rights issues (or wider social/environmental issues for that matter). Nothing wrong with discussing them in general, and they are very important, just that featuring them here would represent a substantial expansion of the wiki's scope, and it is not something we aim to achieve.

			-Keith