mNo edit summary
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
I understand that the naming is not consistent right now but while we are figuring things out it helps to have a standard category at least (however bad it may sound) [[User:Kostas|Kostas]]
I understand that the naming is not consistent right now but while we are figuring things out it helps to have a standard category at least (however bad it may sound) [[User:Kostas|Kostas]]


Sounds good to me. My intention wasn't to remove the other categories, only to include the originals. I should have noted that. Additionally, if the common consensus is to use pluralized category names I'm also cool with that. [[User:Tob|Tob]] ([[User talk:Tob|talk]])
    Sounds good to me. My intention wasn't to remove the other categories, only to include the originals. I should have noted that. Additionally, if the common consensus is to use pluralized category names I'm also cool with that. [[User:Tob|Tob]] ([[User talk:Tob|talk]])


All good, I should have checked the revision history rather than just the message. Honestly I made the pluralized name and I kind of regret it now but I was in a rush to have at least something to categorize by. Whenever it is apparent which one people prefer or if another scheme is decided upon I expect we will set up redirects. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]]
All good, I should have checked the revision history rather than just the message. Honestly I made the pluralized name and I kind of regret it now but I was in a rush to have at least something to categorize by. Whenever it is apparent which one people prefer or if another scheme is decided upon I expect we will set up redirects. [[User:Kostas|Kostas]]