Talk:EULA roofie: Difference between revisions

Line 8:

Agree. I propose that article should be reworded. EULA Roofie can be referred to as a colloquialism, and its meaning explained, but it should not be the main title or reference term for this Theme. Discussion here about an appropriate alternative is welcomed! -Keith

I second that. I've heard EULA Rugpull floating around, but I'd suggest Term Spiking Heres my terms list I've been working on:

Agreement Abuse

├── License Laundering (ownership undermining)

│ └── Converting purchases to licenses

│ └── Revoking perpetual rights

│ └── Redefining ownership terms

│

├── Feature Ransom (functionality hostaging)

│ └── Blocking core functionality

│ └── Converting features to services

│ └── Requiring new agreements for use

│

├── Term Spiking (stealth changes)

│ ├── Silent Updates

│ ├── Buried Changes

│ └── Version Obfuscation

│

├── Legal Lockout (rights obstruction)

│ └── Arbitration requirements

│ └── Class action restrictions

│ └── Jurisdiction control

│

├── Rights Stripping (systematic removal)

│ └── Warranty elimination

│ └── Usage restriction

│ └── Remedy blocking

│

└── Service Siphoning (forced conversion)

└── Subscription forcing

└── Feature reclassification

└── Access degradation

-Travis

=Should this be replaced with something more internationally applicable?=

@@ Line 8: / Line 8: @@
      Agree. I propose that article should be reworded. EULA Roofie can be referred to as a colloquialism, and its meaning explained, but it should not be the main title or reference term for this Theme. Discussion here about an appropriate alternative is welcomed!  -Keith
+    I second that. I've heard EULA Rugpull floating around, but I'd suggest Term Spiking Heres my terms list I've been working on:
+    Agreement Abuse
+    ├── License Laundering (ownership undermining)
+    │   └── Converting purchases to licenses
+    │   └── Revoking perpetual rights
+    │   └── Redefining ownership terms
+    │
+    ├── Feature Ransom (functionality hostaging)
+    │   └── Blocking core functionality
+    │   └── Converting features to services
+    │   └── Requiring new agreements for use
+    │
+    ├── Term Spiking (stealth changes)
+    │   ├── Silent Updates
+    │   ├── Buried Changes
+    │   └── Version Obfuscation
+    │
+    ├── Legal Lockout (rights obstruction)
+    │   └── Arbitration requirements
+    │   └── Class action restrictions
+    │   └── Jurisdiction control
+    │
+    ├── Rights Stripping (systematic removal)
+    │   └── Warranty elimination
+    │   └── Usage restriction
+    │   └── Remedy blocking
+    │
+    └── Service Siphoning (forced conversion)
+        └── Subscription forcing
+        └── Feature reclassification
+        └── Access degradation
+    -Travis
 =Should this be replaced with something more internationally applicable?=