Consent-or-pay: Difference between revisions
Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
Added effectiveness and alternative practice sections with relevant sources. will fix soon Tags: Reverted Visual edit |
||
Line 56: | Line 56: | ||
===Criticisms from policymakers=== | ===Criticisms from policymakers=== | ||
In 2024, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published | In 2024, the European Data Protection Board (EDPB) published a non-binding opinion on "Valid Consent in the Context of Consent or Pay Models Implemented by Large Online Platforms." The EDPB denotes that the consent-or-pay model does not constitute as valid consent and that appropriate alternative measures to the model should provide users with an "equivalent alternative." Additionally, they say that if a company wishes to use a payment model, then the opposing equal alternative should not involve processing personal data. Any choice in which users feel compelled to consent does not qualify as valid consent.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=17 April 2024 |title=EDPB: ‘Consent or Pay’ models should offer real choice |url=https://www.edpb.europa.eu/news/news/2024/edpb-consent-or-pay-models-should-offer-real-choice_en |website=European Data Protection Board}}</ref> | ||
Anu Talus, Chair of the EDPB, said:<blockquote>“Online platforms should give users a real choice when employing ‘consent or pay’ models. The models we have today usually require individuals to either give away all their data or to pay. As a result most users consent to the processing in order to use a service, and they do not understand the full implications of their choices.”<ref name=":0" /></blockquote> | Anu Talus, Chair of the EDPB, said:<blockquote>“Online platforms should give users a real choice when employing ‘consent or pay’ models. The models we have today usually require individuals to either give away all their data or to pay. As a result most users consent to the processing in order to use a service, and they do not understand the full implications of their choices.”<ref name=":0" /></blockquote> | ||
Line 62: | Line 62: | ||
===Consumer advocates=== | ===Consumer advocates=== | ||
Example Text<ref>{{Cite web |last=Illman |first=Erin Jane |date=2024-07-29 |title=Can Privacy Be Bought? How Scrutiny of Meta’s Subscription Model Has Wider Implications –PART II |url=https://natlawreview.com/article/can-privacy-be-bought-how-scrutiny-metas-subscription-model-has-wider-0 |website=The National Law Review}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-28 |title=noyb files GDPR complaint against Meta over “Pay or Okay” |url=https://noyb.eu/en/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-against-meta-over-pay-or-okay |website=noyb}}</ref> | Example Text<ref>{{Cite web |last=Illman |first=Erin Jane |date=2024-07-29 |title=Can Privacy Be Bought? How Scrutiny of Meta’s Subscription Model Has Wider Implications –PART II |url=https://natlawreview.com/article/can-privacy-be-bought-how-scrutiny-metas-subscription-model-has-wider-0 |website=The National Law Review}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2023-11-28 |title=noyb files GDPR complaint against Meta over “Pay or Okay” |url=https://noyb.eu/en/noyb-files-gdpr-complaint-against-meta-over-pay-or-okay |website=noyb}}</ref> | ||
== Effectiveness == | |||
The effects of the consent-or-pay model vary widely. | |||
Advertising Week reports only 30% of users accept the cookies after the GDPR<ref>{{Cite web |title= |url=https://advertisingweek.com/as-the-open-marketplace-fails-advertisers-are-turning-to-publishers-to-reach-audiences/}}</ref> | |||
(2023) According to The Drum, as much as 40% of users simply use a VPN<ref>{{Cite web |title= |url=https://www.thedrum.com/opinion/2023/05/09/70-consumers-blocking-cookies-online-research-shows}}</ref> | |||
(PG 2025) Meanwhile, "When users are equally offered the chance to “accept all” or “reject all” cookies, consent rates are typically somewhere around 70-80%, according to both Skovgaards and Contentpass founder Dirk Freytag.<ref>{{Cite web |title= |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/marketing/consent-or-pay-uk-publishers-advertising-2025/}}</ref> | |||
== Alternative practices == | |||
The Guardian develops a new "contextual advertising" model that bases ads upon whatever page the user is currently viewing (i.e. food ingredients on a recipe page). They say, “It’s a perfect advertising product for a privacy conscious brand and a brand doing the right thing.” They report a 35% increase in clicks.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Maher |first=Bron |date=21 November 2023 |title=Guardian gets around readers who reject cookies with new advertising product |url=https://pressgazette.co.uk/marketing/guardian-light-reject-cookies-advertising-stereotype/ |website=Press Gazette}}</ref> | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Common terms]] | [[Category:Common terms]] |