Customer Privacy Guide: Difference between revisions

Jerry468 (talk | contribs)
Added Introduction 3 and quick fix up for introduction 2.
Jerry468 (talk | contribs)
Added a somewhat interesting way of documenting the overall issues of google.
Line 25: Line 25:
*[https://hidden-services.today/ Hidden Services Today] (Clearnet, darknet available [http://q3o3hdjbf6vwxdnpskyhxw7w7rnmnfhz2szbuala4q24x6csbp7adiad.onion/ here]) - A somewhat interesting website, however, his guides and other resources he lists are something worth considering (Be aware of misleading information, especially [https://PrivacyTools.io PrivacyTools.io] being listed as "recommended").
*[https://hidden-services.today/ Hidden Services Today] (Clearnet, darknet available [http://q3o3hdjbf6vwxdnpskyhxw7w7rnmnfhz2szbuala4q24x6csbp7adiad.onion/ here]) - A somewhat interesting website, however, his guides and other resources he lists are something worth considering (Be aware of misleading information, especially [https://PrivacyTools.io PrivacyTools.io] being listed as "recommended").


== Introduction Three (3) - Clarifications & Explanations ==
==Introduction Three (3) - Clarifications & Explanations==


=== Why should I not trust big tech? (Software/Hardware wise) ===
===Why should I not trust big tech? (Software/Hardware wise)===
Because many of us (you the viewer and the wiki contributors) know that they simply cannot be trusted, no matter what. You may have seen that [[Google]] is introducing an [[Android]] "certified devices" update regarding [[Google|Google Play]] when [[Google plans to restrict sideloading of Android apps|developers have to verify themselves]] and to prevent side-loading. Which, in the process of verification, it can lead into [[de-anonymization]]. Another one, [[Microsoft]] acknowledged the fact that what Windows 10 is doing is illegal in terms of privacy.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Davey |first=Winder |date=Aug 28, 2019, 03:40am EDT |title=Microsoft Confirms Windows 10 Privacy Investigation With A $4 Billion Sting |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2019/08/28/microsoft-confirms-windows-10-privacy-investigation-with-a-4-billion-sting/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2019/08/28/microsoft-confirms-windows-10-privacy-investigation-with-a-4-billion-sting/ |archive-date=May 7th, 2025 |access-date=August 28th, 2025 |work=Forbes}}</ref> Or how about [[Mozilla]], having their [[firefox]] to have a [[terms of service]] ([[Mozilla introduces TOS to Firefox|2]]) because they are an [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/advertising/ advertising company]. How about [[Apple]] having their MacOS having an increased [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ84qw4ZMxc surveillance capabilities]. There are many examples of this and honestly, there are '''many reasons why you should not trust big tech corporations''' like these.
Because many of us (you the viewer and the wiki contributors) know that they simply cannot be trusted, no matter what. You may have seen that [[Google]] is introducing an [[Android]] "certified devices" update regarding [[Google|Google Play]] when [[Google plans to restrict sideloading of Android apps|developers have to verify themselves]] and to prevent side-loading. Which, in the process of verification, it can lead into [[de-anonymization]]. Another one, [[Microsoft]] acknowledged the fact that what Windows 10 is doing is illegal in terms of privacy.<ref>{{Cite news |last=Davey |first=Winder |date=Aug 28, 2019, 03:40am EDT |title=Microsoft Confirms Windows 10 Privacy Investigation With A $4 Billion Sting |url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2019/08/28/microsoft-confirms-windows-10-privacy-investigation-with-a-4-billion-sting/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://www.forbes.com/sites/daveywinder/2019/08/28/microsoft-confirms-windows-10-privacy-investigation-with-a-4-billion-sting/ |archive-date=May 7th, 2025 |access-date=August 28th, 2025 |work=Forbes}}</ref> Or how about [[Mozilla]], having their [[firefox]] to have a [[terms of service]] ([[Mozilla introduces TOS to Firefox|2]]) because they are an [https://www.mozilla.org/en-US/advertising/ advertising company]. How about [[Apple]] having their MacOS having an increased [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FQ84qw4ZMxc surveillance capabilities]. There are many examples of this and honestly, there are '''many reasons why you should not trust big tech corporations''' like these.


Line 34: Line 34:
For now this will be a list of "trusted*" corporations that we the contributors put into.
For now this will be a list of "trusted*" corporations that we the contributors put into.


* [https://proton.me/ Proton AG]
*[https://proton.me/ Proton AG]
* [https://tuta.com/ Tuta]
*[https://tuta.com/ Tuta]
 
=== Why should I not trust Governments? (Anywhere, technically) ===
There are many reasons why, for example, The United States of America, their [[wikipedia:National_Security_Agency|National Security Agency]], back in 2013, When [[wikipedia:Edward_Snowden|Edward Snowden]] leaked classified information regarding the active surveillance that was deemed unconstitutional, according [https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded The Guardian]. Another example, China, [[wikipedia:National_Intelligence_Law_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China|anything established or headquartered in China must provide data to intelligence agencies]], which may include [[ByteDance|Bytedance]] such as Tiktok. In Russia, there is a new app call "[https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/21/tech/max-messenger-app-russia-smartphones-intl Max]" that is made by the state government, and is considered as a replacement to the "VK" messenger, what's concerning, for now, is that it may track Russian citizens.


===Why should I not trust Governments? (Anywhere, technically)===
There are many reasons why, for example, The United States of America, their [[wikipedia:National_Security_Agency|National Security Agency]], back in 2013, When [[wikipedia:Edward_Snowden|Edward Snowden]] leaked classified information regarding the active surveillance that was deemed unconstitutional, according [https://www.theguardian.com/world/interactive/2013/nov/01/snowden-nsa-files-surveillance-revelations-decoded The Guardian]. Another example, China, [[wikipedia:National_Intelligence_Law_of_the_People's_Republic_of_China|anything established or headquartered in China must provide data to intelligence agencies]], which may include [[ByteDance|Bytedance]] such as [[TikTok]]. In Russia, there is a new app call "[https://edition.cnn.com/2025/08/21/tech/max-messenger-app-russia-smartphones-intl Max]" that is made by the state government, and is considered as a replacement to the "VK" messenger, what's concerning, for now, is that it may track Russian citizens. In the European Union, in the year 2022, the "[https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_25_920 ProtectEU]" project, they wanted every encryption to be backdoored<ref>{{Cite news |last=Chiara |first=Castro |date=May 8th, 2025 |title=Chat Control 2.0? Experts urge the EU not to undermine encryption with new ProtectEU plan |url=https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/chat-control-2-0-experts-urge-the-eu-not-to-undermine-encryption-with-new-protecteu-plan |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250508124026/https://www.techradar.com/computing/cyber-security/chat-control-2-0-experts-urge-the-eu-not-to-undermine-encryption-with-new-protecteu-plan |archive-date=May 8th, 2025. |access-date=August 31st, 2025. |work=TechRadar}}</ref>, and nowadays, it is supported by [https://fightchatcontrol.eu/ 15 member states].


The issue is that we shouldn't trust our own governments just because they are 'honest', which they aren't, we gotta be speculative on the things that they pose a danger to. Do note that we do not endorse any sort of sensitive activity when it comes to, say, endorsing or promoting [[wikipedia:Anarchism|anarchism]], that is a separate issue that you must figure it out. Ideally, there is no such thing as a true good government.


== Manual One (1) - The basics ==
let's start off with the things you use.


=== Google LLC ===
We all know why, but let me list some reasons why not to use them and list some adversarial traits that may have been documented.
{| class="wikitable"
|+Google Adversarial Attack Tree
!Traits
!Aftermath
!Mitigation's
!Notes
|-
|Advertising
|Selling your data to third party data brokers
|Opt-out, Adblockers.
|While opting out maybe isn't as effective as it should be, but it will do the job.
|-
|Backdoored Software/Services<ref>{{Cite web |first=GNU is Not Unix |title=Google's Software is Malware |url=https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-google.en.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250520022029/https://www.gnu.org/proprietary/malware-google.en.html |archive-date=May 20th, 2025 |access-date=August 31st, 2025 |website=GNU Operating System}}</ref>
|Law enforcement (or your government) can actually subpoena your data to be handed over, soon, you might get arrested for something you didn't or did do.
|Keep illegal activities away from Google, Create a purpose for a Google account, keep it minimal as possible, aka low profile.
|Do not put all eggs in one basket, keep them in a separate account and do not defeat the purpose of such accounts, do it somewhere else.
|-
|Remote installation of what was once disabled (Systemic issue, check google play store for further details)
|Once you have disabled or uninstalled a google software from your phone, it can be re-enabled and/or reinstalled by tomorrow.
|No new information is available on how to mitigate this issue.
|While invasive, there are some apps that cannot be deleted whatsoever, which is just another example of what will happen if it becomes the next [[Apple]].
|-
|Location Tracking (Many sources)<ref>{{Cite news |last=Hautala |first=Laura |date=Aug. 20, 2018 |title=Google sued over tracking user location amid privacy concerns |url=https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/google-sued-over-keeping-location-data-amid-privacy-concerns/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210920093729/https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/google-sued-over-keeping-location-data-amid-privacy-concerns/ |archive-date=September 20th, 2021 |access-date=August 31st, 2025 |work=Cnet}}</ref>
|It can profile and track whenever you go, full surveillance on your habits when going outside.
|Turn off location tracking (Ineffective because of dark-patterns)
|Not exactly sure if turning it off is good or not, as we can agree that it does have dark-patterns in many ways.
|-
|The walled garden<ref>{{Cite news |last=Jatain |first=Vishveshwar |date=16th of June, 2021 |title=The walled gardens of ad tech, explained |url=https://blockthrough.com/blog/the-walled-gardens-of-the-ad-tech-industry-explained/ |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20210616182313/https://blockthrough.com/blog/the-walled-gardens-of-the-ad-tech-industry-explained/ |archive-date=June 16th, 2021 |access-date=August 31st, 2025 |work=Blockthrough}}</ref>
|It makes you tightly integrated into the Googles ecosystem, in any shape of form of escaping this walled garden, it becomes impossible, due to laziness or highly dependent on.
|Breaking out the habit of staying in one ecosystem. Break the laziness and start working on removing yourself from it, and look for other options instead.
|None. It is obvious.
|-
|
|
|
|
|}