User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson/Bad Articles: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
*[[Xiaomi's disclosure of kernel sources]] | *[[Xiaomi's disclosure of kernel sources]] | ||
*[[Raven]] | *[[Raven]] | ||
*[[Shutting down of community-run Minecraft servers by Mojang]] | |||
Revision as of 09:53, 1 September 2025
Hello. This is a self-made unofficial page that is used for when I see bad articles that I can’t just immediately fix. You can use this too, but I might just make mistakes when flagging up pages, so be careful of that. Below is how I rate articles to put on here (these are mostly guiding rules):
- Does it have a stub/incomplete/SloppyAI notice?
- Has it had any major edits in a long time?
- Does it use basic rules? (NPOV, using templates, etc)
- Does it have a deletion request? If it does, ignore most of the time.
- Does it have references?
The bad articles.
- RepairShopr
- RepairShopr Data Privacy
- Pinterest (not actually that bad though)
- Audible enrolled Amazon customers in Audible memberships without their knowledge or consent
- Keychron k13 pro
- MikroTik ignoring WiFi disconnecting after firmware upgrade on hAP ax3 / ax2 / cAP ax
- Renault UK End EV Battery Lease Agreement
- F1TV concurrent streams limit
- 3B CPAP Devices (3b Medical) (ReactHealth)
- Happiest Baby
- ByteDance
- Bosch
- Steelseries Aerox 3 Lightweight Gaming Mouse
- License euthanasia
- Medical ventilators
- Game ownership and the companies against it
- Adobe's AI policy
- Adobe Firefly
- Xiaomi's disclosure of kernel sources
- Raven
- Shutting down of community-run Minecraft servers by Mojang