Talk:EULA roofie: Difference between revisions
→Image is too large: Reply |
m →Is the term consistent with the "Granny Rule" in the mission statement?: Clean up display, wikify user names and added unsigned tag. |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
==Is the term consistent with the "Granny Rule" in the mission statement?== | ==Is the term consistent with the "Granny Rule" in the mission statement?== | ||
It is a good term, but it is not clear to me that it is consistent with the Granny Rule in the mission statement. The term may be seen as overly inflammatory for Granny. It might also offend movements that defend sexual assault survivors. Do we consider this an exception to the Granny Rule? What are your thoughts? | It is a good term, but it is not clear to me that it is consistent with the Granny Rule in the mission statement. The term may be seen as overly inflammatory for Granny. It might also offend movements that defend sexual assault survivors. Do we consider this an exception to the Granny Rule? What are your thoughts? — <small>The preceding unsigned comment was added by [[User:I Still Will Not Use Discord|I Still Will Not Use Discord]] ([[User talk:I Still Will Not Use Discord|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/I Still Will Not Use Discord|contribs]]) 15 January 2025</small> | ||
:Agree. I propose that article should be reworded. EULA Roofie can be referred to as a colloquialism, and its meaning explained, but it should not be the main title or reference term for this Theme. Discussion here about an appropriate alternative is welcomed! -[[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Keith|contribs]]) 16 January 2025 | |||
::I second that. I've heard EULA Rugpull floating around, but I'd suggest Term Spiking Heres my terms list I've been working on: | |||
Agreement Abuse | Agreement Abuse | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
└── Access degradation | └── Access degradation | ||
::-[[User:Travis|Travis]] ([[User talk:Travis|talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/Travis|contribs]]) 17 January 2025 | |||
==Should this be replaced with something more internationally applicable?== | ==Should this be replaced with something more internationally applicable?== |