Talk:Artificial intelligence: Difference between revisions
→Scope?: AI as roadmap article |
→Scope?: Control of information - more detail, sources |
||
| Line 30: | Line 30: | ||
:::Since AI is so pervasive as a marketing term, I think it appropriate to have an article on it. If nothing else, to give an easy to find roadmap of other related articles that cover aspects. For example, I would not expect the layman to know what generative AI, or LLMs are - even if much of the content of concern here winds up under such sub-articles. | :::Since AI is so pervasive as a marketing term, I think it appropriate to have an article on it. If nothing else, to give an easy to find roadmap of other related articles that cover aspects. For example, I would not expect the layman to know what generative AI, or LLMs are - even if much of the content of concern here winds up under such sub-articles. | ||
:::I agree that subdivisiion probably makes sense. However, at this point I don't have a clear idea of what bits to split off. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 08:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | :::I agree that subdivisiion probably makes sense. However, at this point I don't have a clear idea of what bits to split off. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 08:51, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:::I am unclear why those particular items seem out of scope. Perhaps you could give more detail? What scoping rule do they violate? Is it because they are primarily "old" consumer concerns, rather than "new" ones? [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 09:23, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
:::'''Control of information.''' Access to information is one of the central pillars of right to repair. Since AI radically changes what information people access, I am missing why it is out of scope. | |||
:::AI summaries in search lead to: Loss of independent journalism.[https://www.404media.co/the-medias-pivot-to-ai-is-not-real-and-not-going-to-work/ The Media's Pivot to AI Is Not Real and Not Going to Work] Loss of review sights. Reviews provided by AI regurgitate manufacturer specs, give incorrect information about products, give questionable recommendations.[https://housefresh.com/beware-of-the-google-ai-salesman/ Beware of the Google AI salesman and its cronies] I haven't seen sources on this, but I see no reason why sites that post repair information/fora would be exempted from this widespread pattern. | |||
:::While not as far as I know related to AI, Mr. Rossman recently noted that his repair business is no longer listed on Google. He said that is a big deal for the size of a repair business like his. That may make it harder for people to exercise the right to repair. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 09:23, 13 September 2025 (UTC) | |||
==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ==Appeal posted re proposed deletion== | ||