Talk:Audible subsidizes its streaming plan via premium credits: Difference between revisions
→Sources: Reply |
→Sources: Reply |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:I also wonder how directly related to consumer protection it is, with it primarily being about how authors get paid. I think it can probably get by on the 'misleading listeners about where their money goes' angle, but just thought it worth mentioning. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 07:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC) | :I also wonder how directly related to consumer protection it is, with it primarily being about how authors get paid. I think it can probably get by on the 'misleading listeners about where their money goes' angle, but just thought it worth mentioning. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 07:18, 30 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
::Yeah, I realized that after reviewing it again last night. It's more of a workers' right issue than consumers' right. I think it's great to see how low a subscription service is willing to go to monetize their completely unsustainable model and was hoping Louis would tack it onto his video. But yeah, not very CRW worthy, and I could see if you want a relevance notice added. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 12:15, 30 September 2025 (UTC) | |||