Talk:Opt-out: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 4 October 2025 by Drakeula in topic Opt-in
→Relevance: opt-in on opt-out |
→Opt-in: new section |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
:I personally think for the sake of having theme articles as building blocks for incidents, this can definitely stay. It is self-explanatory but from what I understand, if we wanted to base an incident article on opt-out being violated, this would be great for it to have. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 05:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC) | :I personally think for the sake of having theme articles as building blocks for incidents, this can definitely stay. It is self-explanatory but from what I understand, if we wanted to base an incident article on opt-out being violated, this would be great for it to have. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 05:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
::I agree that a theme article seems useful. I don't think it is self explanatory. The content that was here didn't even mention opt-in vs. opt-out (and how opt-in is often better for consumer protection issues.) (Pretty much anything many companies make opt-out should be opt-in (like selling my data), and anything they voluntarily make opt-in (like digital coupons) should be opt-out.) [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 22:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC) | ::I agree that a theme article seems useful. I don't think it is self explanatory. The content that was here didn't even mention opt-in vs. opt-out (and how opt-in is often better for consumer protection issues.) (Pretty much anything many companies make opt-out should be opt-in (like selling my data), and anything they voluntarily make opt-in (like digital coupons) should be opt-out.) [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 22:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
== Opt-in == | |||
I redirected opt-in here (since they are related concepts.) [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 22:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 22:26, 4 October 2025
Relevance
Do we need an article for this? It's self-explanatory and it's meaning doesn't inherently change in the context of consumer rights. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:35, 4 September 2025 (UTC)
- I personally think for the sake of having theme articles as building blocks for incidents, this can definitely stay. It is self-explanatory but from what I understand, if we wanted to base an incident article on opt-out being violated, this would be great for it to have. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 05:30, 24 September 2025 (UTC)
- I agree that a theme article seems useful. I don't think it is self explanatory. The content that was here didn't even mention opt-in vs. opt-out (and how opt-in is often better for consumer protection issues.) (Pretty much anything many companies make opt-out should be opt-in (like selling my data), and anything they voluntarily make opt-in (like digital coupons) should be opt-out.) Drakeula (talk) 22:20, 4 October 2025 (UTC)
Opt-in
I redirected opt-in here (since they are related concepts.) Drakeula (talk) 22:26, 4 October 2025 (UTC)