Voluntary Recall of NVIDIA Shield K1 Tablets: Difference between revisions
m Correction in References; adding summary on top |
This incident needs a lot more references to be credible. Nevertheless, corrected references that were there (is this "Incomplete" worthy?); FYI, to insert a wiki reference, go to where you'd like to insert it, click on Insert > More > Citation (Ctrl + Shift + K) > Manual > Website and fill in the boxes that apply. This helps readers find the source for specific sentences. |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
In 2015, NVIDIA voluntarily recalled certain SHIELD Tablets sold between July 2014 and July 2015 after discovering a fire hazard caused by defective lithium-ion batteries. While the recall aimed to protect users from overheating risks, it also resulted in thousands of devices becoming permanently disabled ("bricked") through firmware updates. Because the tablets contained non-removable batteries and NVIDIA offered no replacement parts, affected owners were left with devices that could neither be repaired nor safely shipped for disposal. This raised long-term concerns over digital ownership, repairability, and the environmental impact of bricked consumer hardware. | In 2015, NVIDIA voluntarily recalled certain SHIELD Tablets sold between July 2014 and July 2015 after discovering a fire hazard caused by defective lithium-ion batteries.<ref name=":0">{{Cite web |date=2015-07-31 |title=Notice for NVIDIA Tablet Customers {{!}} Voluntary Recall of NVIDIA SHIELD Tablets |url=https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/notice-for-nvidia-tablet-customers |url-status=live |access-date=2025-10-21 |website=NVIDIA Newsroom}}</ref><ref name=":1">{{Cite web |title=NVIDIA Recalls Tablet Computers Due to Fire Hazard |url=https://www.cpsc.gov/Recalls/2015/NVIDIA-Recalls-Tablet-Computers |access-date=2025-10-21 |website=United States Consumer Product Safety Commission}}</ref> While the recall aimed to protect users from overheating risks, it also resulted in thousands of devices becoming permanently disabled ("bricked") through firmware updates. Because the tablets contained non-removable batteries and NVIDIA offered no replacement parts, affected owners were left with devices that could neither be repaired nor safely shipped for disposal. This raised long-term concerns over digital ownership, repairability, and the environmental impact of bricked consumer hardware. | ||
==Background== | ==Background== | ||
The '''NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet''', released in July 2014, was part of NVIDIA’s gaming-focused Android lineup. It featured a high-performance '''Tegra K1''' processor and targeted gamers and developers. Soon after release, users reported excessive heat generation and battery swelling under load. NVIDIA later identified the root cause as faulty lithium-ion cells. | The '''NVIDIA SHIELD Tablet''', released in July 2014, was part of NVIDIA’s gaming-focused Android lineup. It featured a high-performance '''Tegra K1''' processor and targeted gamers and developers. Soon after release, users reported excessive heat generation and battery swelling under load. NVIDIA later identified the root cause as faulty lithium-ion cells.{{CitationNeeded}} | ||
==Incident== | ==Incident== | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
===NVIDIA’s response=== | ===NVIDIA’s response=== | ||
In August 2015, NVIDIA initiated a '''voluntary global recall''' and urged customers to stop using the affected devices. | In August 2015, NVIDIA initiated a '''voluntary global recall''' and urged customers to stop using the affected devices.<ref name=":0" /><ref name=":1" /> | ||
To prevent further risk, a firmware update was released that '''disabled charging''' and, in some cases, fully '''bricked''' the recalled devices once a replacement was requested. | To prevent further risk, a firmware update was released that '''disabled charging''' and, in some cases, fully '''bricked''' the recalled devices once a replacement was requested. | ||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
As a result, many recalled tablets remained in private hands. Over time, these '''non-functional or semi-functional “bricked” devices''' became a potential fire-load risk if stored incorrectly. | As a result, many recalled tablets remained in private hands. Over time, these '''non-functional or semi-functional “bricked” devices''' became a potential fire-load risk if stored incorrectly. | ||
Some users resold the old units on secondary markets—often unaware or ignoring the recall. | Some users resold the old units on secondary markets—often unaware or ignoring the recall. | ||
New owners later found their devices remotely disabled by NVIDIA’s firmware lockout, with no official repair or unlock path available. | New owners later found their devices remotely disabled by NVIDIA’s firmware lockout, with no official repair or unlock path available. {{Citation needed}} <!-- Here is a "homepage" of this discussion on reddit, however I don't really have the energy to understand this whole issue and cite specific articles. -raster (I didn't make this page): https://www.reddit.com/r/theNvidiaShield/comments/3kcquh/official_shield_tablet_recall_discussion/ --> | ||
==Lawsuit== | ==Lawsuit== | ||
While no major class-action lawsuit emerged, criticism grew around '''NVIDIA’s decision to enforce a firmware lockout''' rather than allowing independent repair or battery replacement. | While no major class-action lawsuit emerged, criticism grew around '''NVIDIA’s decision to enforce a firmware lockout''' rather than allowing independent repair or battery replacement. | ||
Tech-rights advocates pointed to this as an example of '''ownership restriction through software control''', raising questions about digital ownership and the '''right-to-repair'''. | Tech-rights advocates pointed to this as an example of '''ownership restriction through software control''', raising questions about digital ownership and the '''right-to-repair'''.{{Citation needed|reason=which tech experts?}} | ||
==Consumer response== | ==Consumer response== | ||
| Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
Many appreciated NVIDIA’s swift safety recall and the no-cost replacement program. | Many appreciated NVIDIA’s swift safety recall and the no-cost replacement program. | ||
Others criticized the handling of old units, citing wasted hardware, environmental impact, and the lack of repair options. | Others criticized the handling of old units, citing wasted hardware, environmental impact, and the lack of repair options. | ||
The lockout effectively turned thousands of otherwise functional tablets into e-waste, fueling debates about manufacturer responsibility in hardware recalls. | The lockout effectively turned thousands of otherwise functional tablets into e-waste, fueling debates about manufacturer responsibility in hardware recalls. Unofficial workarounds exist for users who wished to keep their device from being bricked.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Bogdacutu |first= |date=2015-08-15 |title=Kill the kill switch - "ST - yy" |url=https://xdaforums.com/t/kill-the-kill-switch-st-yy.3179489/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-10-21 |website=XDA Forums}}</ref> | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
[[Category:Nvidia]] | |||