Talk:TRMNL: Difference between revisions
Add topicLatest comment: 21 October 2025 by AnotherConsumerRightsPerson in topic Relevancy discussion
→Relevancy discussion: new section |
→Relevancy discussion: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Relevancy discussion == | ==Relevancy discussion== | ||
I'm not sure this is notable enough for a 'pro-consumer entity'-type page on the wiki. I could see the company being mentioned as a counterpoint on a page talking about the common issues with most e-ink readers, but just not sure it warrants a page of its own. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 11:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC) | I'm not sure this is notable enough for a 'pro-consumer entity'-type page on the wiki. I could see the company being mentioned as a counterpoint on a page talking about the common issues with most e-ink readers, but just not sure it warrants a page of its own. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 11:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Agreed, requesting deletion. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|<i><b>AnotherConsumerRightsPerson</b></i>]] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 06:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 06:00, 21 October 2025
Relevancy discussion
[edit source]I'm not sure this is notable enough for a 'pro-consumer entity'-type page on the wiki. I could see the company being mentioned as a counterpoint on a page talking about the common issues with most e-ink readers, but just not sure it warrants a page of its own. Keith (talk) 11:38, 22 September 2025 (UTC)
- Agreed, requesting deletion. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 06:00, 21 October 2025 (UTC)