Stångåstaden kickbacks and hidden rent: Difference between revisions
CrookedBadge (talk | contribs) Forgot to add a proper link. |
CrookedBadge (talk | contribs) word correction |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
Stångåstaden has reacted by threatening Bahnhoff with legal actions, unless Bahnhoff would send out a correction letter composed by Stångåstaden, which Bahnhof refused to do. <ref name=":0" /> | Stångåstaden has reacted by threatening Bahnhoff with legal actions, unless Bahnhoff would send out a correction letter composed by Stångåstaden, which Bahnhof refused to do. <ref name=":0" /> | ||
===Stångåstaden's response=== | ===Stångåstaden's response=== | ||
When Fredrik Törnqvist, CEO at Stångåstaden was interviewed by [https://www.corren.se Corren], he claimed that the reason for the legal threats was that the mail from Bahnhof to their customers made it seem like Stångåstaden was doing something illegal. After some pressure, Fredrik | When Fredrik Törnqvist, CEO at Stångåstaden was interviewed by [https://www.corren.se Corren], he claimed that the reason for the legal threats was that the mail from Bahnhof to their customers made it seem like Stångåstaden was doing something illegal. After some pressure, Fredrik conceded that the fees could be seen as a form of a hidden rent, since this net rent is a big deal of the companies economy and thanks to it they did not need to increase the advertised rent. He then fell back on the claim that Stångåstaden did nothing illegal. <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-05-07 |title=Corren |url=https://www.corren.se/nyheter/linkoping/artikel/hard-kritik-mot-stangastaden-efter-hojda-avgiften-forjavligt/rk3nm0zl}}</ref> | ||
==Fallout== | ==Fallout== | ||
This incident highlighted a problem that despite internet being almost a necessity nowadays and not a luxury, the providers are not regulated the same way as providers of other necessities (such as electricity or water) are. The rise in prise of the internet in public housings compared to privately owned real estate indicates that Stångåstaden is not the only company who practices similar fee schemes. The incident has started a movement (led by Bahnhof) that attempts to convince politicians to make further regulations that will take the connection to the internet into account <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-08-13 |title=Bredbandsupproret |url=https://bredbandsupproret.se/}}</ref> | This incident highlighted a problem that despite internet being almost a necessity nowadays and not a luxury, the providers are not regulated the same way as providers of other necessities (such as electricity or water) are. The rise in prise of the internet in public housings compared to privately owned real estate indicates that Stångåstaden is not the only company who practices similar fee schemes. The incident has started a movement (led by Bahnhof) that attempts to convince politicians to make further regulations that will take the connection to the internet into account <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-08-13 |title=Bredbandsupproret |url=https://bredbandsupproret.se/}}</ref> | ||