Disney wrongful-death lawsuit: Difference between revisions
Added statement from Disney |
m Fixed formatting issue |
||
Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
In May 2024, Disney attempted to have the case dismissed from court and sent to [[Forced Arbitration|arbitration]], citing two separate user agreements: | In May 2024, Disney attempted to have the case dismissed from court and sent to [[Forced Arbitration|arbitration]], citing two separate user agreements: | ||
# The Disney+ user agreement Piccolo accepted in 2019 when signing up for a free trial to Disney's streaming service on his PlayStation | |||
# Terms accepted when purchasing (ultimately unused) Epcot tickets through the My Disney Experience app in September 2023 | |||
This represented a classic example of a [[EULA roofie]], where Disney attempted to use terms buried within a streaming service agreement to deny a consumer's right to sue over an unrelated wrongful death case at a restaurant. Disney argued that because Piccolo had clicked "Agree & Continue" when signing up for the Disney+ streaming service, he was bound by an arbitration clause for any legal claims against the company or its affiliates when the food served by a restaurant on their premises killed his wife; regardless of whether the issue was related to the streaming service. | This represented a classic example of a [[EULA roofie]], where Disney attempted to use terms buried within a streaming service agreement to deny a consumer's right to sue over an unrelated wrongful death case at a restaurant. Disney argued that because Piccolo had clicked "Agree & Continue" when signing up for the Disney+ streaming service, he was bound by an arbitration clause for any legal claims against the company or its affiliates when the food served by a restaurant on their premises killed his wife; regardless of whether the issue was related to the streaming service. |