Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Wikimedia Foundation: Reply |
|||
| Line 328: | Line 328: | ||
==[[Wikimedia Foundation]]== | ==[[Wikimedia Foundation]]== | ||
As far as things goes, there was a heated discussion about contents at [[Wikimedia Foundation]] where [[User:Beanie Bo]] insisted that many contents we've added are out of the scope, although later on some mods clarified on the Discord server that the so-called "name and shame" pages on Wikipedia do fall in the scope since they constitute privacy violations. But now Beanie Bo, who apparently is out of the loop from the Discord server discussion, had went against that consensus by removing the section about the privacy violations, while putting the page up for deletion which will mean the compromise of impartiality which wouldn't make a good look for Louis as he reportedly wants to present the findings to the Congress one day. Pinging [[User:Keith]] and [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] for third opinions. [[Special:Contributions/15.181.161.29|15.181.161.29]] 14:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | As far as things goes, there was a heated discussion about contents at [[Wikimedia Foundation]] where [[User:Beanie Bo]] insisted that many contents we've added are out of the scope, although later on some mods clarified on the Discord server that the so-called "name and shame" pages on Wikipedia do fall in the scope since they constitute privacy violations. But now Beanie Bo, who apparently is out of the loop from the Discord server discussion, had went against that consensus by removing the section about the privacy violations, while putting the page up for deletion which will mean the compromise of impartiality which wouldn't make a good look for Louis as he reportedly wants to present the findings to the Congress one day. Pinging [[User:Keith]] and [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson]] for third opinions. [[Special:Contributions/15.181.161.29|15.181.161.29]] 14:22, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | ||
:I'm not out of the loop. I'm the main person you were talking to on Discord, NK. I suggested that you may create a separate Wikipedia page for the incidents that are relevant to consumer rights violations. Meanwhile, the WikiMedia Foundation page that had already been deemed irrelevant before you even added information, would be deleted for lack of relevance. Painting WMF with a broad brush of negativity for issues that pertain to the running of Wikipedia is inaccurate and unfair. As a company, there have yet to be any validity to its inclusion on the Consumer Rights Wiki. [[User:Beanie Bo|Beanie Bo]] ([[User talk:Beanie Bo|talk]]) 14:30, 7 November 2025 (UTC) | |||