Drakeula (talk | contribs)
Drakeula (talk | contribs)
Line 12: Line 12:
:::A month later than what?
:::A month later than what?
:::This came across as threatening.  (Work on this now, or else.  No reason given for deletion - seems like just to put pressure on an editor who was just trying to help.)  May not be the intent, but that is how it feels.  I don't like threats, so this gave me no incentive to work on this.
:::This came across as threatening.  (Work on this now, or else.  No reason given for deletion - seems like just to put pressure on an editor who was just trying to help.)  May not be the intent, but that is how it feels.  I don't like threats, so this gave me no incentive to work on this.
:::Another way something like this could have been said.  "I am interested in adding some more incidents to this article.  You seem to know about AI.  When you have a minute, could you suggest a few more references, or incidents involving Gemini?  Thanks."
:::Another way something like this could have been said.  "I am interested in adding some more incidents to this article.  You seem to know about AI.  When you have a minute, could you suggest a few more references, or incidents involving Gemini?  Thanks."
:::I respond better to a request like that.  I suspect many others would also. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 17:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
:::I respond better to a request like that.  I suspect many others would also. [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 17:04, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
:::I don't understand what trying to say by emphasis on ''specific to Gemini''.  The security issues I cited are with Gemini. 
:::For example, ChatGPT has similar issues for inducing delusional disorders, misleading, etc.  However it is not (as far as I know) integrated with Gmail, or Google docs, or Google search, or Googles other ubiquitous products.  So, while Gemini shares the same underlying security problems as all LLMs, the impact of these problems in Gemini is greater because of the products reach, and more specific to users of Google products.  I tried to say that in the post blow (which predates this discussion), was that unclear, or ??? [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 17:10, 13 November 2025 (UTC)
:Google says they will not be fixing One of the attack types (ASCII injection) mentioned in article above about prompt injection.  (One that is actually fixable.)  ''Google won’t fix ‘ASCII smuggling’ hack in Gemini AI''  [[https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/10/11/google-wont-fix-ascii-smuggling-hack-in-gemini-ai/]]
:Google says they will not be fixing One of the attack types (ASCII injection) mentioned in article above about prompt injection.  (One that is actually fixable.)  ''Google won’t fix ‘ASCII smuggling’ hack in Gemini AI''  [[https://pivot-to-ai.com/2025/10/11/google-wont-fix-ascii-smuggling-hack-in-gemini-ai/]]
:Gemini is pretty much anywhere you find Google apps, so the targets are plentiful, and Google is going to keep 'em nice and vulnerable.  Not good for consumers.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)
:Gemini is pretty much anywhere you find Google apps, so the targets are plentiful, and Google is going to keep 'em nice and vulnerable.  Not good for consumers.  [[User:Drakeula|Drakeula]] ([[User talk:Drakeula|talk]]) 01:01, 12 October 2025 (UTC)