Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

← Older edit Newer edit →

VisualWikitext

Add topic

Revision as of 21:55, 6 December 2025 edit Keith (talk \| contribs) Autoconfirmed users, Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Push subscription managers, superadmin, Suppressors, Administrators 1,901 edits →Quiz: Reply ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:48, 7 December 2025 edit undo AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk \| contribs) confirmed, Administrators 2,883 edits →Quiz: Reply Newer edit →
Line 117:		Line 117:

	:I guess it probably needs to assess notability as well as scope, and we need to decide where that line goes for the creation of an article (e.g. for forced arbitration, do we need one secondary source to have talked about the forced arbitration in order for it to be notable enough for its own article and not just a mention on the company page?) [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)		:I guess it probably needs to assess notability as well as scope, and we need to decide where that line goes for the creation of an article (e.g. for forced arbitration, do we need one secondary source to have talked about the forced arbitration in order for it to be notable enough for its own article and not just a mention on the company page?) [[User:Keith\|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith\|talk]]) 21:55, 6 December 2025 (UTC)
			::I guess it would need a mention outside of the company page or it might be considered original research. I was thinking about that when I made this, my first idea was just to have the company page but I switched to thinking that a random Reddit post would confirm that it has been talked about and therefore can be added. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson\|talk]]) 06:48, 7 December 2025 (UTC)