Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions

SinexTitan (talk | contribs)
Line 168: Line 168:
::Awesome, thank you very much! :) [[User:JesseAye|JesseAye]] ([[User talk:JesseAye|talk]]) 23:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)
::Awesome, thank you very much! :) [[User:JesseAye|JesseAye]] ([[User talk:JesseAye|talk]]) 23:56, 4 January 2026 (UTC)


== some thoughts on the browser extension ==
==some thoughts on the browser extension==


as the browser extension uses data from the description field could we "rebrand" it? the description of the description field states "Description of '''''x''''' in 150 characters or less" and its name makes it sound like a summary which we already have at the start of every article. instead a field like "info for extension" might be better
as the browser extension uses data from the description field could we "rebrand" it? the description of the description field states "Description of '''''x''''' in 150 characters or less" and its name makes it sound like a summary which we already have at the start of every article. instead a field like "info for extension" might be better
Line 174: Line 174:
edit: smth I missed
edit: smth I missed
[[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 17:17, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
[[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 17:17, 6 January 2026 (UTC)
:Since you put your thoughts, I'll put mine here as well. It is really bad at accuracy of what you are actually looking at. So for example, if you go to addons.mozilla.org, it will only read the addons bit and there are no articles found about "addons" on the CRW. I think it should query not just that, but also in that title: mozilla, mozilla.org, addons.mozilla, etc. This will significantly increase server load, so maybe just mozilla and mozilla.org, for example, but it will make it more accurate. [[User:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|'''''AnotherConsumerRightsPerson''''']] ([[User talk:AnotherConsumerRightsPerson|talk]]) 17:48, 6 January 2026 (UTC)