Consumer Rights Wiki talk:Moderators' noticeboard: Difference between revisions
→Article Relevance appeal: Reply |
SinexTitan (talk | contribs) →Article Relevance appeal: Reply |
||
| Line 190: | Line 190: | ||
:::I see but it still kinda doesn't make sense to me but that doesn't matter. we're actively documenting how AI violates consumer rights with [[Palantir]] and [[Flock Safety]]. I'm also disregarding my earlier disregardation as we also have documented elements that might be argued is human rights. I get being focused in our mission but being so literal with something such as rights which's quite diverse and convoluted doesn't work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 19:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | :::I see but it still kinda doesn't make sense to me but that doesn't matter. we're actively documenting how AI violates consumer rights with [[Palantir]] and [[Flock Safety]]. I'm also disregarding my earlier disregardation as we also have documented elements that might be argued is human rights. I get being focused in our mission but being so literal with something such as rights which's quite diverse and convoluted doesn't work [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 19:30, 6 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
::::I think the issue is probably more with the contents of the article than the topic itself. we also have this one https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Generative_artificial_intelligence which I think stays a bit more on the 'CRW' side of the line... It's a messy area though and I can see both sides. The current [[Artificial intelligence]] article starts off like an intro to AI and then just devolves into an 'AI bad' rant, and I'm not entirely sure it currently brings much more value than a link to Wikipedia's page on AI. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 18:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) | ::::I think the issue is probably more with the contents of the article than the topic itself. we also have this one https://consumerrights.wiki/w/Generative_artificial_intelligence which I think stays a bit more on the 'CRW' side of the line... It's a messy area though and I can see both sides. The current [[Artificial intelligence]] article starts off like an intro to AI and then just devolves into an 'AI bad' rant, and I'm not entirely sure it currently brings much more value than a link to Wikipedia's page on AI. [[User:Keith|Keith]] ([[User talk:Keith|talk]]) 18:16, 7 January 2026 (UTC) | ||
:::::this indeed is a very complicated topic. imo most of its probs stem from its supbar start. I'd like to reform it. I have done that kind of work before but for me it always takes a significant amount of time. which mind you were not to the same scale as [[Artificial intelligence]]. I can do it but can't promise anything. I am random with my contribs. anyhow, could you guys give me a few pointers on what I should keep in mind? [[User:SinexTitan|SinexTitan]] ([[User talk:SinexTitan|talk]]) 18:44, 7 January 2026 (UTC) | |||