Device lifecycle: Difference between revisions
m AnotherConsumerRightsPerson moved page Lifecycle to Device lifecycle: More specific; requesting deletion of redirect made. |
Added archive URLs for 8 citation(s) using CRWCitationBot |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Stub}} | {{Stub}} | ||
Lifecycle means series of stages which something (services, products, ..) passes during its lifetime. <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-04 |title=Life cycle definition |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/life%20cycle |url-status=live}}</ref> | Lifecycle means series of stages which something (services, products, ..) passes during its lifetime. <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-04 |title=Life cycle definition |url=https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/life%20cycle |url-status=live |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251219075944/https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/life%20cycle |archive-date=19 Dec 2025}}</ref> | ||
This article is aimed primarily for physical products at the moment. | This article is aimed primarily for physical products at the moment. | ||
| Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
##Growth phase (sales increase) | ##Growth phase (sales increase) | ||
##Maturity phase (sales flatten) | ##Maturity phase (sales flatten) | ||
##Decline phase (sales decline) <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=Product Lifecycle |url=https://www.scrum.org/resources/product-lifecycle |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08}}</ref> | ##Decline phase (sales decline) <ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=Product Lifecycle |url=https://www.scrum.org/resources/product-lifecycle |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251213074526/https://www.scrum.org/resources/product-lifecycle |archive-date=13 Dec 2025}}</ref> | ||
#End of life<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=PLM: The Future of Product Development |url=https://www.sap.com/products/scm/plm-r-d-engineering/what-is-product-lifecycle-management.html |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=Product Lifecycle - Wikipedia |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_lifecycle |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08}}</ref> | #End of life<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=PLM: The Future of Product Development |url=https://www.sap.com/products/scm/plm-r-d-engineering/what-is-product-lifecycle-management.html |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251107195622/https://www.sap.com/products/scm/plm-r-d-engineering/what-is-product-lifecycle-management.html |archive-date=7 Nov 2025}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-08 |title=Product Lifecycle - Wikipedia |url=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_lifecycle |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-08 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260206034110/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Product_lifecycle |archive-date=6 Feb 2026}}</ref> | ||
| Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
=== Design === | === Design === | ||
Lifecycle costs are defined primarily during design phase.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=How product design decisions can make or break your cost model |url=https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14}}</ref> The impact estimates vary but are usually around 80% probably by reference to [[wikipedia:Pareto_principle|Pareto principle]]. | Lifecycle costs are defined primarily during design phase.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=How product design decisions can make or break your cost model |url=https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251024111742/https://www.manufacturinghub.io/product-design/how-product-design-decisions-can-make-or-break-your-cost-model/ |archive-date=24 Oct 2025}}</ref> The impact estimates vary but are usually around 80% probably by reference to [[wikipedia:Pareto_principle|Pareto principle]]. | ||
During design phase it is the easiest to affect end result by setting specific goals to end product. For example aiming for thin product instead of relatively thin and easily repairable. The actual differences are usually relatively insignificant. | During design phase it is the easiest to affect end result by setting specific goals to end product. For example aiming for thin product instead of relatively thin and easily repairable. The actual differences are usually relatively insignificant. | ||
| Line 35: | Line 35: | ||
=== Useful life === | === Useful life === | ||
At least some products have repeating redesign rounds when they are being in active production. Some component availability might change and replacements are needed. Or management deems incoming warranty cases too infrequent and they see opportunity to cut BOM costs. As seen in official comment from Milwaukee Tools:<blockquote>Products can change several times within their lifetime for a variety of reasons, but the goal is always to exceed the users’ expectations. This time we clearly did not hit the mark.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Milwaukee 2767 M18 Fuel Impact Wrenc Issue: Official Response |url=https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14}}</ref></blockquote>One hearsay is that first version of a product are the sturdiest and follow prudent design guidelines to minimise risks for need to expensive recall campaigns and unexpected increases in Costs Of Goods Sold<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Cost Of Goods Sold explained |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14}}</ref>. When manufacturer has known good baseline that does not get too much warranty cases, they can start redesigning internal components while everything looks the same for consumers. | At least some products have repeating redesign rounds when they are being in active production. Some component availability might change and replacements are needed. Or management deems incoming warranty cases too infrequent and they see opportunity to cut BOM costs. As seen in official comment from Milwaukee Tools:<blockquote>Products can change several times within their lifetime for a variety of reasons, but the goal is always to exceed the users’ expectations. This time we clearly did not hit the mark.<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Milwaukee 2767 M18 Fuel Impact Wrenc Issue: Official Response |url=https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251020070625/https://www.protoolreviews.com/milwaukee-2767-m18-fuel-impact-wrench-issue-official-response/ |archive-date=20 Oct 2025}}</ref></blockquote>One hearsay is that first version of a product are the sturdiest and follow prudent design guidelines to minimise risks for need to expensive recall campaigns and unexpected increases in Costs Of Goods Sold<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Cost Of Goods Sold explained |url=https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-14 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20251114131028/https://www.investopedia.com/terms/c/cogs.asp |archive-date=14 Nov 2025}}</ref>. When manufacturer has known good baseline that does not get too much warranty cases, they can start redesigning internal components while everything looks the same for consumers. | ||
Tracking such internal revisions are practically impossible. See some reasons from the next chapter. From consumer's perspective these are either unknown unknowns or known unknowns when looking things through Rumsfeld Matrix<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Rumsfeld Matrix |url=https://www.theuncertaintyproject.org/tools/rumsfeld-matrix |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-15}}</ref>. | Tracking such internal revisions are practically impossible. See some reasons from the next chapter. From consumer's perspective these are either unknown unknowns or known unknowns when looking things through Rumsfeld Matrix<ref>{{Cite web |date=2025-09-14 |title=Rumsfeld Matrix |url=https://www.theuncertaintyproject.org/tools/rumsfeld-matrix |url-status=live |access-date=2025-09-15 |url-status=live |archive-url=http://web.archive.org/web/20260130052928/https://www.theuncertaintyproject.org/tools/rumsfeld-matrix |archive-date=30 Jan 2026}}</ref>. | ||
And the ultimate decision during useful life is the [[wikipedia:End-of-life_product|End Of Life (EOL) announcement]]. | And the ultimate decision during useful life is the [[wikipedia:End-of-life_product|End Of Life (EOL) announcement]]. | ||