Unlocking Technology Act of 2013: Difference between revisions
Adding the page on the Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 Tags: Mobile edit Mobile web edit |
Added a summary about the bill. Note: please fix the citations. |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
|Description=This was a proposed law to restrict DMCA Section 1201 to only apply to copyright infringement, but it died in committee. | |Description=This was a proposed law to restrict DMCA Section 1201 to only apply to copyright infringement, but it died in committee. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{StubNotice}}The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking digital locks for the sake of copyright infringement.[https://www.digitaltrends.com/mobile/new-bill-legalizes-cell-phone-unlocking-fixes-the-dmca/] It died in committee.[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1892] | |||
{{ | |||
===[ | ==Background== | ||
The [[Digital Millennium Copyright Act|Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA)]] Section 1201 was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products. | |||
==The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013== | |||
Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. [https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2013/05/members-of-congress-finally-introduce-serious-dmca-reform/] The law was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee on May 8, 2013. That committee had done nothing on the bill by December 18, 2013, so it was reassigned to the, Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet subcommittee, which also did nothing with it.[https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr1892/summary] | |||
==References== | ==References== | ||
{{reflist}} | {{reflist}} | ||
Revision as of 02:55, 25 February 2026
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013 was a proposed bipartisan law which would have modified Section 1201 of the DMCA to only restrict breaking digital locks for the sake of copyright infringement.[1] It died in committee.[2]
Background
The Digital Millennium Copyright Act (DMCA) Section 1201 was a law passed which was intended to prevent copyright infringement by making it illegal to break a digital lock (meaning bypass software restrictions put on a smart device). Companies have been making their devices smart partially to use this law to prevent people from modifying their products.
The Unlocking Technology Act of 2013
Representatives Zoe Lofgren (D-CA), Thomas Massie (R-KY), Anna Eshoo (D-CA), and Jared Polis (D-CO) introduced this bill to allow people to break digital locks on devices they purchased as long as it was not intended for copyright infringement. If passed, this law would have allowed for jailbreaking, servicing vehicles, ripping CDs, and more. [3] The law was assigned to the Ways and Means Committee on May 8, 2013. That committee had done nothing on the bill by December 18, 2013, so it was reassigned to the, Courts, Intellectual Property, and the Internet subcommittee, which also did nothing with it.[4]