Talk:Pixel 4a Battery Performance Program: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
ZenithHelix (talk | contribs) Reply to anon: iFixit revelation is crazy. |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
the fact that iFixit has no idea if the batteries they are currently selling, or recently sold, are affected by a problem makes Google look pretty bad here, I was expecting them to have contacted iFixit already on the sixth of january but nope, I am giving them the news<br> | the fact that iFixit has no idea if the batteries they are currently selling, or recently sold, are affected by a problem makes Google look pretty bad here, I was expecting them to have contacted iFixit already on the sixth of january but nope, I am giving them the news<br> | ||
this whole situation keeps getting more and more absurd | this whole situation keeps getting more and more absurd | ||
:: Dear Anon, that's an insane revelation. I'm trying to think whether there's somehow a mysterious third option we're missing that isn't planned obsolescence OR a manufacturing fault. Because your point A is absolutely correct, the battery replacement angle makes no sense in this case. I get if there's a hazard, Google wouldn't just plain say that, but why would they not just tell iFixit something like "oh, the Pixel 4a's batteries are just old, these are newer replacements". What do they mean there's a problem with the device?! There's no way to read this other than "Yeah, there's a problem with the device. We made a problem, with the update, on purpose.". I think this is worth adding to the article, if you can source it somehow. [[User:ZenithHelix|ZenithHelix]] ([[User talk:ZenithHelix|talk]]) 18:50, 21 January 2025 (UTC) | |||