Talk:Advertising overload: Difference between revisions
Latest comment: 12 March by Scholar Silas in topic Reminder about the markings
→Reminder about the markings: new section |
→Reminder about the markings: Reply |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== Reminder about the markings == | ==Reminder about the markings== | ||
Hi there, the AI gen lists at the bottom of the article are covering stuff that heavily supports the article, we NEED these replaced with human-written text, and we ESPECIALLY NEED sources included! I hate that I have to leave these marks on my own article, but it is for the greater good... Please do NOT use the marks as an excuse to blindly delete this (I've seen a few moderators act a little hasty to delete articles that have had these kinds of marks for prolonged periods without discussing it first), I put in a lot of valuable labor that I do NOT want lost! [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC) | Hi there, the AI gen lists at the bottom of the article are covering stuff that heavily supports the article, we NEED these replaced with human-written text, and we ESPECIALLY NEED sources included! I hate that I have to leave these marks on my own article, but it is for the greater good... Please do NOT use the marks as an excuse to blindly delete this (I've seen a few moderators act a little hasty to delete articles that have had these kinds of marks for prolonged periods without discussing it first), I put in a lot of valuable labor that I do NOT want lost! [[User:JamesTDG|JamesTDG]] ([[User talk:JamesTDG|talk]]) 12:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC) | ||
:Hi James! I've rewritten the list, referencing Google Support. I think your AI did use their article, but it categorized things slightly strangely, so I hope you don't mind that I did a little restructuring. | |||
:Cheers! [[User:Scholar Silas|Scholar Silas]] ([[User talk:Scholar Silas|talk]]) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC) | |||
Revision as of 05:31, 12 March 2026
Reminder about the markings
Hi there, the AI gen lists at the bottom of the article are covering stuff that heavily supports the article, we NEED these replaced with human-written text, and we ESPECIALLY NEED sources included! I hate that I have to leave these marks on my own article, but it is for the greater good... Please do NOT use the marks as an excuse to blindly delete this (I've seen a few moderators act a little hasty to delete articles that have had these kinds of marks for prolonged periods without discussing it first), I put in a lot of valuable labor that I do NOT want lost! JamesTDG (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2025 (UTC)
- Hi James! I've rewritten the list, referencing Google Support. I think your AI did use their article, but it categorized things slightly strangely, so I hope you don't mind that I did a little restructuring.
- Cheers! Scholar Silas (talk) 05:31, 12 March 2026 (UTC)