Secure gateway module: Difference between revisions

Line 165:

=== Manufacturer justifications ===

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation ~~argues~~ that ~~SGW is necessary~~ to ~~protect vehicles from cyberattacks~~, ~~citing~~ the ~~2015 Jeep Cherokee hack as proof that open diagnostic access creates safety risks~~.<ref name="alliance-r2r">{{Cite web |url=https://www.autosinnovate.org/RightToRepair |title=Right to Repair |publisher=Alliance for Automotive Innovation |access-date=2026-04-04}}</ref> The Alliance has sued to block both the Massachusetts & Maine right-to-repair laws, arguing that requiring open telematics platforms would ~~expose vehicles to remote exploitation~~.

The Alliance for Automotive Innovation maintains that "automakers already and routinely make available to independent repair shops all the parts, service information and vehicle data needed to diagnose and repair a vehicle" & that "competition is alive and well in the auto repair industry."<ref name="alliance-r2r">{{Cite web |url=https://www.autosinnovate.org/RightToRepair |title=Right to Repair |publisher=Alliance for Automotive Innovation |access-date=2026-04-04}}</ref> The Alliance has sued to block both the Massachusetts & Maine right-to-repair laws, arguing in court filings that requiring open telematics platforms would create cybersecurity vulnerabilities.<ref name="courtlistener-healey" />

=== Aftermarket & consumer advocates ===

@@ Line 165: / Line 165: @@
 === Manufacturer justifications ===
-The Alliance for Automotive Innovation argues that SGW is necessary to protect vehicles from cyberattacks, citing the 2015 Jeep Cherokee hack as proof that open diagnostic access creates safety risks.<ref name="alliance-r2r">{{Cite web |url=https://www.autosinnovate.org/RightToRepair |title=Right to Repair |publisher=Alliance for Automotive Innovation |access-date=2026-04-04}}</ref> The Alliance has sued to block both the Massachusetts & Maine right-to-repair laws, arguing that requiring open telematics platforms would expose vehicles to remote exploitation.
+The Alliance for Automotive Innovation maintains that "automakers already and routinely make available to independent repair shops all the parts, service information and vehicle data needed to diagnose and repair a vehicle" & that "competition is alive and well in the auto repair industry."<ref name="alliance-r2r">{{Cite web |url=https://www.autosinnovate.org/RightToRepair |title=Right to Repair |publisher=Alliance for Automotive Innovation |access-date=2026-04-04}}</ref> The Alliance has sued to block both the Massachusetts & Maine right-to-repair laws, arguing in court filings that requiring open telematics platforms would create cybersecurity vulnerabilities.<ref name="courtlistener-healey" />
 === Aftermarket & consumer advocates ===