SquidthePlummer (talk | contribs)
Line 1: Line 1:
== Merging incidents together ==
==Merging incidents together==


I feel that the refusal to serve and the racist receipt should be merged into one incident as "racism at locations" or something along those lines, as the receipt incident I would assume is only reported on once, but the general racist incidents appear to be widespread. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 21:48, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
I feel that the refusal to serve and the racist receipt should be merged into one incident as "racism at locations" or something along those lines, as the receipt incident I would assume is only reported on once, but the general racist incidents appear to be widespread. [[User:Mr Pollo|Mr Pollo]] ([[User talk:Mr Pollo|talk]]) 21:48, 11 April 2026 (UTC)
:I think I see what you mean when merging incidents <s><sub>hopefully</sub></s>, as I've made a [https://consumerrights.wiki/index.php?title=IHOP&diff=prev&oldid=50895 draft like structure that ''<sub>hopefully</sub>'' illustrates the idea your going for], however I don't think its the play here as it doesn't contain enough incidents to warrant a merger. I would understand if there was a repeated pattern of overall racism or a large number of discriminatory incidents and just one receipt, however <s>from what I can find online</s> there isn't any other incident that delves into the broad of racism while maintaining consumer rights wiki <s><sub>action taskforce</sub></s> guidelines. I think it fine as is until more incidents pop up that maybe warrant a merger in the grand scheme of things.  [[User:SquidthePlummer|SquidthePlummer]] ([[User talk:SquidthePlummer|talk]]) 00:26, 12 April 2026 (UTC)