DCS sues small YouTuber for accurate review: Difference between revisions
m →Cost recovery: & -> and |
|||
| Line 73: | Line 73: | ||
==Australian anti-SLAPP context== | ==Australian anti-SLAPP context== | ||
Australia has no federal anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) legislation. The Australian Capital Territory's ''Protection of Public Participation Act 2008'' is the only anti-SLAPP law in any Australian jurisdiction, but section 8(2)(a) of the Act explicitly excludes defamation claims from its scope, rendering it inapplicable to cases like DCS v Fischer.<ref name="pppa">{{Cite web |title=Protection of Public Participation Act 2008 - Section 8 |url=https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/poppa2008360/s8.html |website=AustLII |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref><ref name="obrien">{{Cite web |title=SLAPP Legislation |url=https://obriensolicitors.com.au/slapp-legislation/ |website=O'Brien Solicitors |date=Dec 2024 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> | Australia has no federal anti-SLAPP (Strategic Lawsuits Against Public Participation) legislation. The Australian Capital Territory's ''Protection of Public Participation Act 2008'' is the only anti-SLAPP law in any Australian jurisdiction, but section 8(2)(a) of the Act explicitly excludes defamation claims from its scope, rendering it inapplicable to cases like ''DCS v Fischer''.<ref name="pppa">{{Cite web |title=Protection of Public Participation Act 2008 - Section 8 |url=https://classic.austlii.edu.au/au/legis/act/consol_act/poppa2008360/s8.html |website=AustLII |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref><ref name="obrien">{{Cite web |title=SLAPP Legislation |url=https://obriensolicitors.com.au/slapp-legislation/ |website=O'Brien Solicitors |date=Dec 2024 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> | ||
In October 2024, 85 organizations including the Human Rights Law Centre | In October 2024, 85 organizations including the Human Rights Law Centre and Australian Conservation Foundation wrote to Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus calling for federal anti-SLAPP laws.<ref name="hrlc">{{Cite web |title=Anti-SLAPP Laws |url=https://www.hrlc.org.au/news/2024-10-31-anti-slapp-laws/ |website=Human Rights Law Centre |date=31 Oct 2024 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> The HRLC's December 2024 report ''Stop the SLAPP'' recommended all Australian governments enact anti-SLAPP legislation.<ref name="hrlc-report">{{Cite web |title=Stop the SLAPP: Protecting Free Speech in Australia |url=https://www.hrlc.org.au/reports/2024-12-5-stop-the-slapp/ |website=Human Rights Law Centre |date=5 Dec 2024 |access-date=28 Mar 2026}}</ref> No federal anti-SLAPP bill has been introduced in the Australian Parliament as of March 2026. | ||
The DCS case joins a pattern of Australian corporations using defamation law to target critics. Previous examples include the Gunns 20 case, where Tasmanian timber company Gunns Ltd sued 20 environmentalists, | The DCS case joins a pattern of Australian corporations using defamation law to target critics. Previous examples include the Gunns 20 case, where Tasmanian timber company Gunns Ltd sued 20 environmentalists, and the Greenpeace vs AGL dispute over criticism of AGL's environmental practices.<ref name="obrien" /> | ||
==See also== | ==See also== | ||