3D Printing restrictions and bans: Difference between revisions

Line 28:

====Overbroad applications====

While consumers treat 3D printers as the definition of a device that extrudes materials to create a 3-dimensional object, the legal definition of a 3D printer is far more broad to cover any machine that handles either additive or subtractive ~~creation of a desired part~~.{{~~Citation needed~~|~~reason~~=~~Check comment~~}} <!-~~- We will need to be flipping through legal sources on this~~, ~~but regions such as WA have treated CNC machines and Prusas under the same category~~.

While consumers treat 3D printers as the definition of a device that extrudes materials to create a 3-dimensional object, the legal definition of a 3D printer is far more broad to cover any machine that handles either additive or subtractive manufacturing.

<ref>{{cite web

|title=HB 2321 - 3D printer blocking tech. (Original Bill), Section 1(7)

|url=https://wa-law.org/bill/2025-26/hb/2321/1/

|website=wa-law.org

|access-date=2026-05-13

}}</ref>

<ref>{{cite web

|title=House Bill 26-1144 (Introduced), Section 1(4)(f)

|url=https://leg.colorado.gov/bill_files/111311/download

|website=Colorado General Assembly

|access-date=2026-05-13

}}</ref>

~~Article which mentions this, but doesn't directly provide the legal definition:~~

Simply put, while this regulation may be intended to target just the consumer definition of 3D printers, CNC machines, laser cutters, and more, may also fall under this legal scrutiny.

~~https://www.geekwire.com/2026/proposals-take-aim-at-3d-printing-tech-to-strengthen-washington-state-laws-against-ghost-guns/ -->~~Simply put, while this regulation may be intended to target just the consumer definition of 3D printers, CNC machines, laser cutters, and more, may also fall under this legal scrutiny.

====Overbroad enforcement====

@@ Line 28: / Line 28: @@
 ====Overbroad applications====
-While consumers treat 3D printers as the definition of a device that extrudes materials to create a 3-dimensional object, the legal definition of a 3D printer is far more broad to cover any machine that handles either additive or subtractive creation of a desired part.{{Citation needed|reason=Check comment}} <!-- We will need to be flipping through legal sources on this, but regions such as WA have treated CNC machines and Prusas under the same category.
+While consumers treat 3D printers as the definition of a device that extrudes materials to create a 3-dimensional object, the legal definition of a 3D printer is far more broad to cover any machine that handles either additive or subtractive manufacturing.
+<ref>{{cite web
+ |title=HB 2321 - 3D printer blocking tech. (Original Bill), Section 1(7)
+ |url=https://wa-law.org/bill/2025-26/hb/2321/1/
+ |website=wa-law.org
+ |access-date=2026-05-13
+}}</ref>
+<ref>{{cite web
+ |title=House Bill 26-1144 (Introduced), Section 1(4)(f)
+ |url=https://leg.colorado.gov/bill_files/111311/download
+ |website=Colorado General Assembly
+ |access-date=2026-05-13
+}}</ref>
-Article which mentions this, but doesn't directly provide the legal definition:
+Simply put, while this regulation may be intended to target just the consumer definition of 3D printers, CNC machines, laser cutters, and more, may also fall under this legal scrutiny.
-https://www.geekwire.com/2026/proposals-take-aim-at-3d-printing-tech-to-strengthen-washington-state-laws-against-ghost-guns/ -->Simply put, while this regulation may be intended to target just the consumer definition of 3D printers, CNC machines, laser cutters, and more, may also fall under this legal scrutiny.
 ====Overbroad enforcement<!-- This section absolutely needs to call for examples -->====