Adobe Creative Suite activation: Difference between revisions
correct two citation url-status values from usurped to dead Tag: Reverted |
restore the previous version Tag: Manual revert |
||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|June 2013 | |June 2013 | ||
|Adobe releases Lightroom 5<ref>{{Cite web |title=Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 |url=https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |url-status= | |Adobe releases Lightroom 5<ref>{{Cite web |title=Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 |url=https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20130611023215/https://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |archive-date=11 Jun 2013 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Adobe]]}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|September 2013 | |September 2013 | ||
| Line 46: | Line 46: | ||
|- | |- | ||
|April 2015 | |April 2015 | ||
|Adobe releases Lightroom 6 under both perpetual licenses and subscription packages<ref>{{Cite web |title=Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC |url=http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |url-status= | |Adobe releases Lightroom 6 under both perpetual licenses and subscription packages<ref>{{Cite web |title=Adobe Photoshop Lightroom CC |url=http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |url-status=usurped |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20150422103340/http://www.adobe.com/products/photoshop-lightroom.html |archive-date=22 Apr 2015 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=[[Adobe]]}}</ref> | ||
|- | |- | ||
|October 2017 | |October 2017 | ||
| Line 71: | Line 71: | ||
====Adobe's response==== | ====Adobe's response==== | ||
While Adobe didn't respond directly to the criticisms, it provided justification through a blog-post about its reasons customers would desire to use Creative Cloud. Some of those being continuous updates, cloud services integration, and flexible access. Adobe then made some changes allegedly in light of user feedback. It continued to support the desktop (Classic) version and even incorporated it into a new plan: an Adobe blog (Dec 2024) explained that the original $9.99/month (20 GB) plan would be retired for new customers, while the 1 TB Photography plan (still $9.99/month) was expanded to include Lightroom Classic.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 Dec 2024 |title=All-New Photography Innovations and Pricing Updates in 2025 |url=https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/12/15/all-new-photography-innovations-pricing-updates |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105122234/https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/12/15/all-new-photography-innovations-pricing-updates |archive-date=2026-01-05 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=Adobe Blog}}</ref> In response to privacy and AI concerns, Adobe emphasized that "you own your content" and that it "never trained generative AI on customer content".<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 Jun 2024 |title=Updating Adobe's Terms of Use |url=https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/10/updating-adobes-terms-of-use |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105122712/https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/10/updating-adobes-terms-of-use |archive-date=2026-01-05 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=Adobe Blog}}</ref> One source reported Adobe's clarifications that it only accesses user files to enable advertised features (e.g. Neural Filters) and explicitly "does not access, view or listen to" content stored locally on users' devices.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wuerthele |first=Mike |date=7 Jun 2024 |title=Adobe has clarified controversial shrinkwrap license terms |url=https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/06/07/adobe-has-clarified-controversial-shrinkwrap-license-terms-but-the-damage-may-have-already-been-done |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250317015045/https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/06/07/adobe-has-clarified-controversial-shrinkwrap-license-terms-but-the-damage-may-have-already-been-done |archive-date=2025-03-17 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=AppleInsider}}</ref> | While Adobe didn't respond directly to the criticisms, it provided justification through a blog-post about its reasons customers would desire to use Creative Cloud. Some of those being continuous updates, cloud services integration, and flexible access. Adobe then made some changes allegedly in light of user feedback. It continued to support the desktop (Classic) version and even incorporated it into a new plan: an Adobe blog (Dec 2024) explained that the original $9.99/month (20 GB) plan would be retired for new customers, while the 1 TB Photography plan (still $9.99/month) was expanded to include Lightroom Classic.<ref>{{Cite web |date=15 Dec 2024 |title=All-New Photography Innovations and Pricing Updates in 2025 |url=https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/12/15/all-new-photography-innovations-pricing-updates |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105122234/http://web.archive.org/screenshot/https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/12/15/all-new-photography-innovations-pricing-updates |archive-date=2026-01-05 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=Adobe Blog}}</ref> In response to privacy and AI concerns, Adobe emphasized that "you own your content" and that it "never trained generative AI on customer content".<ref>{{Cite web |date=10 Jun 2024 |title=Updating Adobe's Terms of Use |url=https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/10/updating-adobes-terms-of-use |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260105122712/http://web.archive.org/screenshot/https://blog.adobe.com/en/publish/2024/06/10/updating-adobes-terms-of-use |archive-date=2026-01-05 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=Adobe Blog}}</ref> One source reported Adobe's clarifications that it only accesses user files to enable advertised features (e.g. Neural Filters) and explicitly "does not access, view or listen to" content stored locally on users' devices.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Wuerthele |first=Mike |date=7 Jun 2024 |title=Adobe has clarified controversial shrinkwrap license terms |url=https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/06/07/adobe-has-clarified-controversial-shrinkwrap-license-terms-but-the-damage-may-have-already-been-done |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20250317015045/https://appleinsider.com/articles/24/06/07/adobe-has-clarified-controversial-shrinkwrap-license-terms-but-the-damage-may-have-already-been-done |archive-date=2025-03-17 |access-date=16 Mar 2025 |website=AppleInsider}}</ref> | ||
=====Adobe-provided support===== | =====Adobe-provided support===== | ||