ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
ClippyWantsToHelp (talk | contribs)
created section: "Experts & politicians response"
Line 22: Line 22:


The imposition of a restriction without the user's petition is defined as an arbitrary form of block, interference or even a discrimination, as this only allows a certain group of people to access to certain content (in this case being social media).
The imposition of a restriction without the user's petition is defined as an arbitrary form of block, interference or even a discrimination, as this only allows a certain group of people to access to certain content (in this case being social media).
==Experts & politicians response==
Experts claim the possibility to implement such age verification systems in the country is something difficult and pretty complex to be acheived, along with the implementation of ClaveÚnica as the method of age verification raises privacy concerns as the statal system is tied with a person's identity.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Campos |first=Sofía|date=15 Jun 2026 |title=¿Más protección o vulneración de derechos? Uso de ClaveÚnica para redes sociales de menores abre debate entre expertos |trans-title=More protection or rights vulneration? Usage of ClaveÚnica for social media for minors opens debate amongst experts |url=https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/15/1202874/clave-unica-redes-sociales-menores.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260615231935/https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/15/1202874/clave-unica-redes-sociales-menores.html |archive-date=2026-06-15|access-date=15 Jun 2026 |website=Emol}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=apellido |first=nombre |date=13 Jun 2026 |title=¿Ingreso de menores a RR.SS. mediante Clave Única?: La idea del Gobierno que abrió debate entre expertos |trans-title=Minors accessing to social media using Clave Única?: The Government's idea that opened a debate among experts |url=https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/13/1202730/redes-sociales-clave-unica-mideso.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260615232402/https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/13/1202730/redes-sociales-clave-unica-mideso.html |archive-date=2026-06-15 |access-date=15 Jun 2026 |website=Emol}}</ref>
Johannes Kaiser, representative of the National Libertarian Party (PNL) responded claiming the addition of these restrictions are violating the rights of privacy and freedom and granting the State to surveil Chileans on the net.<ref>https://x.com/Jou_Kaiser/status/2066635492867670422 - [Archived https://megalodon.jp/2026-0616-0842-38/https://x.com:443/Jou_Kaiser/status/2066635492867670422]</ref><ref>https://x.com/Jou_Kaiser/status/2065970495938306464 - [Archived https://megalodon.jp/2026-0616-0855-02/https://x.com:443/Jou_Kaiser/status/2065970495938306464]</ref>


==Consumer response==
==Consumer response==
The legislation project has received mixed responses and generated a broad debate in media, with some users approving it and other rejecting and critizicing its effectiveness. Experts claim the possibility to implement such age verification systems in the country is something difficult, along with the implementation of ClaveÚnica as the method of age verification raises privacy concerns as the statal system is tied with a person's identity. Johannes Kaiser, representative of the National Libertarian Party (PNL) responded claiming the addition of these restrictions are violating the rights of privacy and freedom and granting the State to surveil Chileans on the net.<ref>{{Cite web |last=Campos |first=Sofía|date=15 Jun 2026 |title=¿Más protección o vulneración de derechos? Uso de ClaveÚnica para redes sociales de menores abre debate entre expertos |trans-title=More protection or rights vulneration? Usage of ClaveÚnica for social media for minors opens debate amongst experts |url=https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/15/1202874/clave-unica-redes-sociales-menores.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260615231935/https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/15/1202874/clave-unica-redes-sociales-menores.html |archive-date=2026-06-15|access-date=15 Jun 2026 |website=Emol}}</ref><ref>{{Cite web |last=apellido |first=nombre |date=13 Jun 2026 |title=¿Ingreso de menores a RR.SS. mediante Clave Única?: La idea del Gobierno que abrió debate entre expertos |trans-title=Minors accessing to social media using Clave Única?: The Government's idea that opened a debate among experts |url=https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/13/1202730/redes-sociales-clave-unica-mideso.html |url-status=live |archive-url=https://web.archive.org/web/20260615232402/https://www.emol.com/noticias/Nacional/2026/06/13/1202730/redes-sociales-clave-unica-mideso.html |archive-date=2026-06-15 |access-date=15 Jun 2026 |website=Emol}}</ref><ref>https://x.com/Jou_Kaiser/status/2066635492867670422 - [Archived https://megalodon.jp/2026-0616-0842-38/https://x.com:443/Jou_Kaiser/status/2066635492867670422]</ref><ref>https://x.com/Jou_Kaiser/status/2065970495938306464 - [Archived https://megalodon.jp/2026-0616-0855-02/https://x.com:443/Jou_Kaiser/status/2065970495938306464]</ref>
The legislation project has received mixed responses and generated a broad debate in media, with some users approving it and other rejecting and critizicing its effectiveness.  
 


Several users in social media have manifested their concerns involving the possibility the system is used for surveillance, censorship, the erosion of consumer rights and the right of privacy, and freedom to access to information on the net. Some users also have higlighted the parental controls exists and parents should be responsible to control and educate their children instead of the State.
Several users in social media have manifested their concerns involving the possibility the system is used for surveillance, censorship, the erosion of consumer rights and the right of privacy, and freedom to access to information on the net. Some users also have higlighted the parental controls exists and parents should be responsible to control and educate their children instead of the State.