Consumer Technology Association: Difference between revisions

Line 36:

==Lobbying==

== History of Lies ==

==~~Testifying~~==

==Testimonies==

====Right to Repair in Maine (LD1977 "An Act To Ensure a Consumer's Right To Repair Certain Electronic Products" )====

====Right to Repair in Maine (LD1977 SP679 "An Act To Ensure a Consumer's Right To Repair Certain Electronic Products")====

The CTA's VP of Environmental Affairs and Industry Sustainability testified that "[the] issue that's been raised about e-waste and concern about how not passing legislation like this [] might increase e-waste, I would remind the committee that Maine has a robust [https://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/ewaste/index.html e-waste law and program in place]... ...we are not looking at a situation where e-waste in Maine [is] going into landfills." While this may be strictly true of Maine landfills, e-waste recycling faces serious issues perpetuated by many of the same industry practices which make repair difficult. "Smartphones are becoming lighter and slimmer, and their batteries are no longer removable, making recycling much more difficult and labour-intensive. Manual sorting requires workers to be constantly exposed to toxic substances, albeit at a low level, over a long period, while these difficult-to-recycle electronic devices require facilities to constantly upgrade their machines to keep up with the changing technology, lowering the incentive for businesses to recycle e-waste that is already difficult to disassemble.[https://earth.org/what-is-e-waste-recycling/ "] Additionally, outsourcing of e-waste recycling represents an environmental health disaster to less developed countries, leading to China banning the import of many categories of waste[[wikipedia:Operation_National_Sword|.]] Right to Repair stands to greatly reduce the generation of e-waste and make it's recycling much more cost effective, at the expense of reducing the number of new devices purchased as replacements. Reduce, then Reuse (repair or salvage parts) and then Recycle.

The CTA's VP of Environmental Affairs and Industry Sustainability testified that "[the] issue that's been raised about e-waste and concern about how not passing legislation like this might increase e-waste, I would remind the committee that Maine has a robust [https://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/ewaste/index.html e-waste law and program in place]... ...we are not looking at a situation where e-waste in Maine [is] going into landfills." While this may be strictly true of Maine landfills, e-waste recycling faces serious issues perpetuated by many of the same industry practices which make repair difficult. "Smartphones are becoming lighter and slimmer, and their batteries are no longer removable, making recycling much more difficult and labour-intensive. Manual sorting requires workers to be constantly exposed to toxic substances, albeit at a low level, over a long period, while these difficult-to-recycle electronic devices require facilities to constantly upgrade their machines to keep up with the changing technology, lowering the incentive for businesses to recycle e-waste that is already difficult to disassemble.[https://earth.org/what-is-e-waste-recycling/ "] Additionally, outsourcing of e-waste recycling represents an environmental health disaster to less developed countries, leading to China banning the import of many categories of waste[[wikipedia:Operation_National_Sword|.]] Right to Repair stands to greatly reduce the generation of e-waste and make it's recycling much more cost effective, at the expense of reducing the number of new devices purchased as replacements. Reduce, then Reuse (repair or salvage parts) and then Recycle.

More than a year after this testimony and the allegation that investments and lobbying for e-waste recycling more than makes up for anti-repair practices, the Maine Monitor published [https://themainemonitor.org/there-are-more-devices-in-mainers-lives-than-ever-no-one-knows-where-they-end-up/ this report]. To quote the article, "Mainers are generating more electronic waste than ever. And no one knows what percentage of that waste is sent for recycling." He also includes statistics for sold phones, trade-ins, and phones given to friends or relatives to give a false view that only 2% of phones are thrown into the trash when looking at phones at end of life.

More than a year after this testimony and the allegation that investments and lobbying for e-waste recycling more than makes up for anti-repair practices (and the death of the bill in committee), the Maine Monitor published [https://themainemonitor.org/there-are-more-devices-in-mainers-lives-than-ever-no-one-knows-where-they-end-up/ this report]. To quote the article, "Mainers are generating more electronic waste than ever. And no one knows what percentage of that waste is sent for recycling." He also includes statistics for sold phones, trade-ins, and phones given to friends or relatives to give a false view that only 2% of phones are thrown into the trash when looking at phones at end of life.

@@ Line 36: / Line 36: @@
 ==Lobbying==
+== History of Lies ==
-==Testifying==
+==Testimonies==
-====Right to Repair in Maine (LD1977 "An Act To Ensure a Consumer's Right To Repair Certain Electronic Products" )====
+====Right to Repair in Maine (LD1977 SP679 "An Act To Ensure a Consumer's Right To Repair Certain Electronic Products")====
-The CTA's VP of Environmental Affairs and Industry Sustainability testified that "[the] issue that's been raised about e-waste and concern about how not passing legislation like this [] might increase e-waste, I would remind the committee that Maine has a robust [https://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/ewaste/index.html e-waste law and program in place]... ...we are not looking at a situation where e-waste in Maine [is] going into landfills." While this may be strictly true of Maine landfills, e-waste recycling faces serious issues perpetuated by many of the same industry practices which make repair difficult. "Smartphones are becoming lighter and slimmer, and <u>their batteries are no longer removable</u>, making recycling much more difficult and labour-intensive. Manual sorting requires workers to be constantly exposed to toxic substances, albeit at a low level, over a long period, while these <u>difficult-to-recycle electronic devices require facilities to constantly upgrade their machines to keep up with the changing technology</u>, lowering the incentive for businesses to recycle e-waste that is already difficult to disassemble.[https://earth.org/what-is-e-waste-recycling/ "] Additionally, outsourcing of e-waste recycling represents an environmental health disaster to less developed countries, leading to China banning the import of many categories of waste[[wikipedia:Operation_National_Sword|.]] Right to Repair stands to greatly reduce the generation of e-waste and make it's recycling much more cost effective, at the expense of reducing the number of new devices purchased as replacements. Reduce, then Reuse (repair or salvage parts) and then Recycle.
+The CTA's VP of Environmental Affairs and Industry Sustainability testified that "[the] issue that's been raised about e-waste and concern about how not passing legislation like this might increase e-waste, I would remind the committee that Maine has a robust [https://www.maine.gov/dep/waste/ewaste/index.html e-waste law and program in place]... ...we are not looking at a situation where e-waste in Maine [is] going into landfills." While this may be strictly true of Maine landfills, e-waste recycling faces serious issues perpetuated by many of the same industry practices which make repair difficult. "Smartphones are becoming lighter and slimmer, and <u>their batteries are no longer removable</u>, making recycling much more difficult and labour-intensive. Manual sorting requires workers to be constantly exposed to toxic substances, albeit at a low level, over a long period, while these <u>difficult-to-recycle electronic devices require facilities to constantly upgrade their machines to keep up with the changing technology</u>, lowering the incentive for businesses to recycle e-waste that is already difficult to disassemble.[https://earth.org/what-is-e-waste-recycling/ "] Additionally, outsourcing of e-waste recycling represents an environmental health disaster to less developed countries, leading to China banning the import of many categories of waste[[wikipedia:Operation_National_Sword|.]] Right to Repair stands to greatly reduce the generation of e-waste and make it's recycling much more cost effective, at the expense of reducing the number of new devices purchased as replacements. Reduce, then Reuse (repair or salvage parts) and then Recycle.
-More than a year after this testimony and the allegation that investments and lobbying for e-waste recycling more than makes up for anti-repair practices, the Maine Monitor published [https://themainemonitor.org/there-are-more-devices-in-mainers-lives-than-ever-no-one-knows-where-they-end-up/ this report]. To quote the article, "Mainers are generating more electronic waste than ever. And no one knows what percentage of that waste is sent for recycling." He also includes statistics for sold phones, trade-ins, and phones given to friends or relatives to give a false view that only 2% of phones are thrown into the trash when looking at phones at end of life.
+More than a year after this testimony and the allegation that investments and lobbying for e-waste recycling more than makes up for anti-repair practices (and the death of the bill in committee), the Maine Monitor published [https://themainemonitor.org/there-are-more-devices-in-mainers-lives-than-ever-no-one-knows-where-they-end-up/ this report]. To quote the article, "Mainers are generating more electronic waste than ever. And no one knows what percentage of that waste is sent for recycling." He also includes statistics for sold phones, trade-ins, and phones given to friends or relatives to give a false view that only 2% of phones are thrown into the trash when looking at phones at end of life.