Talk:Forced arbitration with Smartwool socks: Difference between revisions
→Merge article: new section |
m Keith moved page Talk:Forced Arbitration On SOCKS! Purposely Difficult Opt Out Scam Explained to Talk:Forced arbitration with Smartwool socks: old name was quite radical |
||
(No difference)
| |||
Revision as of 18:30, 20 February 2025
Tone usage
Hi there! I know this article is in a very early stage, but I just thought I might mention this as a course-correction early on rather than once the whole article has been written. Ideally we'd like for incident articles to be very neutral, written from an unbiased perspective, and focusing on the facts of the matter, as well as an accurate reporting of commentator and community reactions to the incident in question. The NPOV concept discussed in the Wiki Content Policies should summarise this, as should the discussion of tone within the Consumer Action Taskforce:Editorial guidelines and the Article Types pages.
Keith (talk) 00:35, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
Merge article
Hey @Katastrophic and @RMCHammer I see that you have added some info to this page. I think this would fit better in the company page that resulted from this video. I have linked it in a merge request if you fell like trying to enchance it.