Consumer Action Taskforce talk:Moderator guidelines
Just a few typos
- Note: it is permissible for an incident to be positive, as long as it is both noteable <-notable
- The company does not have an existing page, which the artice <- article
- The level of managerial independance <- independence
- The level of managerial independance - how independant <- independent
- Stub (for an article which is simply underdeveloped: the content currentlyu <-
lead to deletion if it's in massive violation of the No Original Reaearch <-
Basically a limbo to put articles in where their merits can be discussed before a descision <- decision
- Demonstrate (through evidence, and assertion by sources, not thorugh <- through
- If the Incident affected only a small hanfdful <-
- The article should be neutral and factual, without unneccesarily -< unnecessarily
A user reported that an Amazon delivery driver accessed their garage through their phone without authorization
- Demonstrate a pattern of similar incidents or systemic flaws in Amazon's delivery authorization <- authorisation?
- Remove aricle, <-
A person brought a 5-year-old iPhone 11 for battery replacement at official Apple Store in Rio. After a $170 service, both cameras stopped working. Apple blamed previous unauthorized <- unauthorised?
-- Preceding unsigned comment by DavidBenJr at 04:21, 15 January 2025
The spelling of “authorization” and the like depend on regional standards. Americans tend to spell it with a z, and the z spelling is actually also preferred by the Oxford English Dictionary. This is in contrast to analyze/analyse, where the OED prefers the s spelling. There is some etymological reason that I cannot be bothered to remember. Mingyee (talk) 11:53, 20 January 2025 (UTC)