Shrinkflation

Revision as of 07:04, 1 September 2025 by JamesTDG (talk | contribs) (More cleanup, too tired to continue working)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work for its sourcing and verifiability to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:

  1. Needs more examples
  2. Needs more cleanup
  3. Needs more elaboration on existing sections

This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, please visit the Moderator's noticeboard, or the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼


Shrinkflation (from “shrink” + “inflation”; Dutch: krimpflatie), additionally referred to as also known as package downsizing, weight-out,[1] and price pack architecture,[2] is a corporate strategy where manufacturers reduce the size or quantity of a product while maintaining an equal or higher price. The packaging often remains unchanged, making the reduction nearly imperceptible to consumers.

Related to shrinkflation is skimpflation, where the quality of a product or service is reduced instead of its size or weight, without a corresponding drop in price. Both practices are considered forms of “hidden inflation” that affect consumer purchasing power.[3]

Definition and concept edit

Shrinkflation is defined by a rise in the general price level of goods per unit of weight or volume in proportion to the contents within a package diminishing,[4] often leading to the price remaining the same.[5] In many scenarios, companies will redesign the packaging to hide these flaws, such as making the bottom more concave, or giving the packaging an hourglass-like shape that can slowly get more exaggerated.[6] Alternatively, the physical product can be modified to include more air,[1] or in cases where the product arrives in a boxed state, may quietly reduce the amount of product inside the packaging without significantly updating the packaging.[6]

Historical context edit

The concept of shrinkflation predates the term itself; economists have documented cases as early as the 1970s, particularly during periods of high inflation when companies sought to avoid explicit price hikes.[4][7] However, shrinkflation as a term gained popularity in the early 2010s, attributed to British economist Pippa Malmgren, who used it to describe hidden inflation in consumer goods.[8]

After the COVID-19 pandemic caused supply chain disruptions, labor shortages, and rapid inflation, a sibling term known as Skimpflation gained widespread usage, as businesses were cutting back service quality and/or product standards in order to maintain prices.[3]

For both of these problems, periods of economic stress and high inflation tend to accelerate the usage of these strategies, as demonstrated during the global inflation spike between 2021 and 2024.[6]

Prevalence and examples edit

In the Netherlands, the Consumentenbond (Consumers’ Association) has documented numerous cases of shrinkflation:[5]

  • Maaslander aged cheese: Reduced from 200 g to 175 g, then to 150 g in 2023, and further to 140 g in late 2024, with prices remaining stable.
  • Ariel washcapsules: Fell from 14 capsules in 2020 to 10 capsules in 2025.
  • Snack a Jacks Barbecue Paprika rice cakes: Declined from 145 g to about 103 g over several years.

These incremental reductions (“shrink upon shrink”) often go unnoticed by consumers.

In one attempt to distract consumers from rising shrinkflation, Cadbury stated “Our Eggs Aren’t Smaller, You Are Bigger”, and after consumers were reporting progressive shrinkage year-over-year for the eggs,[9][10] an episode of Late Night With Conan O'Brien demonstrated that these eggs were in-fact shrinking.[11]

Consumer response and complaints edit

In 2024, the Consumentenbond’s Meldpunt Eerlijk (Fair Complaints Line) received about 250 reports related to shrinkflation.[5] Although fewer than in previous years, this may reflect that most content reductions had already been implemented or were subtle enough to escape attention.

Industry reaction edit

Manufacturers often state that retailers set prices, while they only recommend retail pricing. Some claim reductions result from product improvements or changing consumer needs—a rationale the Consumentenbond rejects.[5]

Consumer protection efforts edit

The Consumentenbond has called for:[5]

  1. Clear labeling when content is reduced.
  2. Public tracking of shrinkflation examples.
  3. Legal action against deceptive practices, potentially leading to fines of up to €900,000.[12]
  4. Engagement with industry to promote transparency, though supermarket chains and manufacturers have resisted mandatory disclosures.

Related phenomena edit

Skimpflation occurs when companies lower the quality of goods or services rather than the size or weight, while keeping prices unchanged or even increasing them.[3] Examples include cheaper ingredients in food products, reduced customer service staffing, or less frequent cleaning in hotels. Like shrinkflation, skimpflation effectively reduces consumer value without an obvious price change.

International comparisons edit

In France, Carrefour labels products whose contents have been reduced without a price drop.[13] Consumer organizations in other countries, such as the UK and the US, have also raised awareness about shrinkflation and skimpflation.[7]

References edit

  1. 1.0 1.1 Milligan, Brian (Jul 24, 2017). "More than 2,500 products subject to shrinkflation, says ONS". BBC News. Archived from the original on 2017-07-24. Retrieved Aug 31, 2025.
  2. J. Edward Moreno (2024-05-31). "What's a fancy name for shrinkflation?". NY Times. Retrieved Aug 31, 2025.
  3. 3.0 3.1 3.2 Garcia, Adrian Ma and Darian Woods (19 October 2021). "Skimpflation is hitting your favorite services". NPR. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  4. 4.0 4.1 Gale, William G. (1975). The Economic Effects of Inflation. Brookings Institution Press. ISBN 9780815730411. {{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
  5. 5.0 5.1 5.2 5.3 5.4 "Krimpflatie op krimpflatie: inhoud verpakkingen stapsgewijs steeds kleiner". Consumentenbond (in Nederlands). Consumentenbond. 7 February 2025. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  6. 6.0 6.1 6.2 "Shrinkflation and skimpflation: How inflation is reshaping consumer value". OECD. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  7. 7.0 7.1 "Shrinkflation and skimpflation: Are we getting less for our money?". CNN Business. 15 July 2023. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  8. "Shrinkflation is real – here's why everything is getting smaller". The Guardian. 7 November 2017. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  9. "Cadbury: Our Eggs Aren't Smaller, You Are Bigger". The Consumerist. Apr 8, 2007. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved Aug 31, 2025.
  10. TheMuggler (Apr 7, 2007). "The Cadbury Creme Egg Conspiracy". Yes but No but Yes. Archived from the original on May 10, 2007. Retrieved Aug 31, 2025.
  11. O'Brien, Conan (Apr 1, 2021). "B.J. Novak Proves Cadbury Eggs Are Getting Smaller - "Late Night With Conan O'Brien"". YouTube. Retrieved Aug 31, 2025.
  12. "Consumentenbond wil krimpflatie bij de rechter aanpakken". RTL Z (in Nederlands). 18 October 2023. Retrieved 14 August 2025.
  13. "Carrefour warns shoppers over shrinkflation". BBC News. 8 September 2023. Retrieved 14 August 2025.