Talk:Malicious compliance

Revision as of 13:33, 7 November 2025 by Beanie Bo (talk | contribs) (Relevance: Reply)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

Latest comment: 7 November 2025 by Beanie Bo in topic Relevance

Relevance

edit

I get why this concept may be relevant, but I don't believe it's worth a dedicated article. It's vague and isn't fundamentally unethical. Beanie Bo (talk) 02:00, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply

It’s tiny too, you can go on the Moderators' noticeboard about this. Just not much to talk about at all. AnotherConsumerRightsPerson (talk) 07:38, 29 August 2025 (UTC)Reply
I removed the deletion request. There is potential for this to be a theme article that notes relevant cases of malicious compliance, particularly related to GDPR and other legislation Beanie Bo (talk) 13:33, 7 November 2025 (UTC)Reply