PepsiCo

Revision as of 23:04, 17 May 2026 by Sojourna (talk | contribs) (Removed cleanup tag.)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)

This article is a stub. You can help by expanding it.

A moderator needs to check the page before this notice can be removed. Visit the noticeboard or the #appeals channel in either Zulip or Discord to request removal.
More info ▼

An article may be flagged as a stub when it is missing major elements needed to make it useful to a reader. You can help by adding missing sections, verifiable sources, relevant company policies and communications, etc. to make the article more complete.

PepsiCo, Inc. is an American food and beverage corporation.

PepsiCo
Basic information
Founded 1898-08-28
Legal Structure Public
Industry Beverage, Food processing
Also known as
Official website https://www.pepsico.com

Consumer impact summary

edit

Overview of concerns that arise from the conduct towards users of the product (if applicable):

  • User Freedom
  • User Privacy
  • Business Model
  • Market Control

Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


Incidents

edit

This is a list of all consumer-protection incidents this company is involved in. Any incidents not mentioned here can be found in the PepsiCo category.

Pepsi runs misleading advertising campaign to give away a Harrier II jet (1996)

edit

In March 1996, Pepsi began the "Pepsi Stuff" advertising campaign which claimed that you could redeem "Pepsi Points" for a variety of things including and up to a Harrier II jet. When John Leonard produced enough points to purchase the jet, they refused on the grounds that it was not intended to be taken seriously. Leonard chose to pursue a lengthy legal campaign against Pepsi for the alleged false advertising (see Leonard v. Pepsico, Inc.).

Multiple similar campaigns were performed outside of the United States, with similar results, as outlined in the "Pepsi, Where's My Jet?" docuseries on Netflix.

PepsiCo exposes customers to lead without prior knowledge (2006)

edit

On 21 April 2006, the California state government announced that PepsiCo was agreeing to a consent judgment over claims of violating the California Safe Drinking Water and Toxic Enforcement Act, alleging that Mexico Pepsi and West Jefferson Mountain Dew had failed to warn Californian consumers that their products contained lead and cadmium.[1][2]

 
PepsiCo pep+ program strategy

Hiding how much carcinogenic food coloring in products (2014—2016)

edit

Thamar Santisteban Cortina separately sued Pepsico and Goya Foods in January 2014 over the products Pepsi, Pepsi One, and Diet Pepsi, allegedly containing excessive amount of 4-methylimidazole (which can cause severe health risks like cancer) without properly informing consumers.[3][4][5]

PepsiCo's motion for a change of venue to the Northern District of California (from Southern) was granted 30 April 2014.[6] It was consolidated with Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc. on 20 June 2014.[7] A class action settlement was granted final approval on 30 August 2016.[8]

PepsiCo and Walmart sued by FTC for rigging soft drink prices (2025)

edit

On 17 January 2025, the Federal Trade Commission filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo and Walmart for violating the Robinson-Patman Act by allegedly allowing Walmart to sell Pepsi products at lower prices than its competitors.[9][10][11]

The lawsuit was dismissed without prejudice by the FTC in a 3-0 vote on 22 May 2025, with FTC Chairman Andrew Ferguson reasoning that "the Biden-Harris FTC rushed to authorize this case just three days before President Trump's inauguration in a nakedly political effort to commit this administration to pursuing little more than a hunch that Pepsi had violated the law."[12]

Lawsuit accuses PepsiCo and Coca-Cola of running campaigns lying about environmental benefits to consumers (2024)

edit
 
PepsiCo post on X.

On 29 October 2024, Los Angeles County in California filed a lawsuit against PepsiCo and Coca-Cola on 2024 over misleading consumers with a disinformation campaign designed to make consumers believe that their products are environmental friendly — in particular single-use plastic bottles and the efficacy of recycling them.[13][14] [15]

The case was removed from Los Angeles Superior Court to the Central District of California on 2 December 2024,[16] before eventually being remanded back to Superior Court on 14 March 2025.[17] Its current status is unknown as of 17 May 2026.

Products

edit

This is a list of the company's product lines with articles on this wiki.


Add your text below this box. Once this section is complete, delete this box by clicking on it and pressing backspace.


See also

edit

References

edit
  1. "Attorney General Lockyer Announces Multi-Million Dollar Settlement With Pepsi to Eliminate Lead in Mexican Bottles". California Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General. 21 Apr 2006. Archived from the original on 13 Jun 2012. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  2. Lockyer, Bill (18 July 2006). "People Of The State Of Ca et al v. Pepsico Inc, Case No. BC351120" (PDF). California Department of Justice - Office of the Attorney General. Archived (PDF) from the original on 17 Dec 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  3. Clark, Simon (27 Jun 2017). "Pepsi, Goya Accused of Hiding Levels of Potentially Dangerous Caramel Color". Classaction. Archived from the original on 21 Mar 2026. Retrieved 5 Mar 2026.
  4. Antell, Amanda (29 Jan 2014). "Class Action Says Pepsi, Malta Goya Contain Cancer-Causing Chemical". Top Class Actions. Archived from the original on 21 Mar 2026. Retrieved 5 Mar 2026.
  5. Warmerdam, Elizabeth (28 Jan 2014). "Class Claims Pepsi Contains Carcinogen". Courthouse News Service. Archived from the original on 21 Mar 2026. Retrieved 5 Mar 2026.
  6. Miller, Jeffrey T. (30 Apr 2014). "Cortina v. Pepsico, Inc. (3:14-cv-00168)". PacerMonitor. Archived from the original on 17 May 2026. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  7. Chen, Edward M. (20 Jun 2014). "Cortina v. Pepsico, Inc. (4:14-cv-02023)". PacerMonitor. Archived from the original on 17 May 2026. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  8. Chen, Edward M. (30 Aug 2016). "Sciortino v. Pepsico, Inc. (3:14-cv-00478)". Court Listener. Archived from the original on 17 May 2026. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  9. "FTC Sues PepsiCo for Rigging Soft Drink Competition". Federal Trade Commission. 17 Jan 2025. Archived from the original on 17 Jan 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  10. Schweizer, Errol (18 Dec 2025). "How Walmart And Pepsico Rigged Prices And Supercharged Food Inflation". Forbes. Archived from the original on 21 Mar 2026. Retrieved 5 Mar 2026.
  11. Wood, James R. (17 Dec 2025). "Walmart, Pepsi accused of manipulating prices". Consumer Affairs. Archived from the original on 16 Feb 2026. Retrieved 21 Mar 2026.
  12. "FTC Dismisses Lawsuit Against PepsiCo". Federal Trade Commission. 22 May 2025. Archived from the original on 23 May 2025. Retrieved 16 May 2026.
  13. Harrison, Dawyn R.; Kuhn, Scott (29 Oct 2024). "Los Angeles County v PepsiCo, Inc. and The Coca-Cola Company, et al (Case No. 24STCV28450)" (PDF). County of Los Angeles. Archived (PDF) from the original on 14 May 2025. Retrieved 17 May 2026.
  14. "LA County Sues Pepsi and Coca-Cola over Plastic Beverage Pollution and Deceiving Public on Plastic Recycling". County of Los Angeles. 30 Oct 2024. Archived from the original on 3 Nov 2024. Retrieved 17 May 2026.
  15. Edwards, Jessy (8 Nov 2024). "Pepsi, Coca-Cola untruthful about about single-use plastic waste, lawsuit claims". Top Class Actions. Archived from the original on 21 Mar 2026. Retrieved 5 Mar 2026.
  16. "The People of the State of California v. PepsiCo, Inc. (2:24-cv-10340)". Court Listener. 2 Dec 2024. Archived from the original on 17 May 2026. Retrieved 17 May 2026.
  17. Wu, George H. (14 Mar 2025). "The People of the State of California v. PepsiCo, Inc. (2:24-cv-10340)". Court Listener. Archived from the original on 17 May 2026. Retrieved 17 May 2026.