Talk:Anthropic's Claude Code source leak

Relevance discussion

Just starting this discussion for people to talk about whether or not this page is relevant @Tracerneo @Linka

In general it's best practice to start a relevancy discussion when marking a page as irrelevant, so that previous contributors have an opportunity to understand and respond to the reasons why it has been marked as such. Keith (talk) 01:52, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

To add my thoughts here: I'm not seeing how this is related to or affects consumer rights. One could perhaps argue that the take-down of legitimate repositories constitutes an issue, however even that is very tenuous. Such persons being affected would not have even occurred in the first place if other users in the communities hadn't knowingly uploaded infringing content. The fault lies much more on them than it does Anthropic. — Sojourna (talk) 03:59, 28 May 2026 (UTC)

I agree that it wouldn't have happened if people did not post the source code, though it was anthropic's fault it became public just like it's their fault for doing a carpet-bombing removal or any repositories without checking what they are, just because the dmca tool allows them to.

I could change the perspective of the incident on the page from the source code leak to just the dmca "abusa", the leak part would just be part of the background Linka (talk) 08:10, 28 May 2026 (UTC)