Price fixing
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Learn more ▼
Price fixing is determined by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as
An agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct) among competitors to raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize prices or price levels.[1]
This agreement often is used as a dark pattern among companies established among various industries to harm consumers, despite its illegal status within the United States and its territories.[1]
How it works edit
Price fixing tends to cause the price of a product to be consistent among competitors, however, this often comes to the detriment of consumers, since if Company X were to raise the prices of a product, so would Company Y and Company Z. This eliminates competition in local, and sometimes even larger, scales.
Why it is a problem edit
Elimination of competition edit
In the current economic landscape, competition drives the benefit of the consumer, be it by driving down prices, providing better quality products, and more. The elimination of this competition means events such as shrinkflation may occur.
Refusal of service edit
Cases, such as in Puerto Rico with optometrists,[2] have occurred where unless contracts were on collectively agreed-upon terms from the companies, that these contracts were refused or threatened to be refused. This can corner consumers to agree to unfavorable terms, such as forced arbitration, to access a product or service.
Examples edit
Some examples of price fixing include:
References edit
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Federal Trade Commission. "Price Fixing". ftc.gov. Retrieved Mar 24, 2025.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Federal Trade Commission (Sep 11, 2007). "Colegio de Optometras, Edgar Davila Garcia, O.D., and Carlos Rivera Alonso, O.D., In the Matter of". ftc.gov. Retrieved Mar 24, 2025.