Price fixing
❗Article Status Notice: This Article is a stub
This article is underdeveloped, and needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. Issues may include:
- This article needs to be expanded to provide meaningful information
- This article requires additional verifiable evidence to demonstrate systemic impact
- More documentation is needed to establish how this reflects broader consumer protection concerns
- The connection between individual incidents and company-wide practices needs to be better established
- The article is simply too short, and lacks sufficient content
How You Can Help:
- Add documented examples with verifiable sources
- Provide evidence of similar incidents affecting other consumers
- Include relevant company policies or communications that demonstrate systemic practices
- Link to credible reporting that covers these issues
- Flesh out the article with relevant information
This notice will be removed once the article is sufficiently developed. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the Discord (join here) and post to the #appeals
channel, or mention its status on the article's talk page.
Price fixing is determined by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) as
An agreement (written, verbal, or inferred from conduct) among competitors to raise, lower, maintain, or stabilize prices or price levels.[1]
This agreement often is used as a dark pattern among companies established among various industries to harm consumers, despite its illegal status within the United States and its territories.[1]
How it works edit
Price fixing tends to cause the price of a product to be consistent among competitors, however, this often comes to the detriment of consumers, since if Company X were to raise the prices of a product, so would Company Y and Company Z. This eliminates competition in local, and sometimes even larger, scales.
Why it is a problem edit
Elimination of competition edit
In the current economic landscape, competition drives the benefit of the consumer, be it by driving down prices, providing better quality products, and more. The elimination of this competition means events such as shrinkflation may occur.
Refusal of service edit
Cases, such as in Puerto Rico with optometrists,[2] have occurred where unless contracts were on collectively agreed-upon terms from the companies, that these contracts were refused or threatened to be refused. This can corner consumers to agree to unfavorable terms, such as forced arbitration, to access a product or service.
Examples edit
Some examples of price fixing include:
References edit
- ↑ 1.0 1.1 Federal Trade Commission. "Price Fixing". ftc.gov. Retrieved Mar 24, 2025.
- ↑ 2.0 2.1 Federal Trade Commission (Sep 11, 2007). "Colegio de Optometras, Edgar Davila Garcia, O.D., and Carlos Rivera Alonso, O.D., In the Matter of". ftc.gov. Retrieved Mar 24, 2025.