Talk:Vulcan Strength
Latest comment: 23 February by Keith in topic So is it relevant or not?
So is it relevant or not?
editIt's been long enough at this point that a decision should be made. If the incident section is purged, then the article page itself has little reason to exist. And as for my opinion on the legal dispute, there's yet to be any proof that it rises beyond a simple feud between two private parties. And when it comes to themes, there's stronger examples elsewhere already on the wiki. — Sojourna (talk) 04:14, 23 February 2026 (UTC)
- I think given that it's a company attempting to shut down negative reviews, the incident is relevant (as it may indicate that there are other negative reviews of their products which were successfully taken down, or just that they're the sort of company that will use lawfare against reviewers, etc. etc..).
- Definitely a stub though, and have marked it as such. But yeah, the lawsuit itself is only against one person but the effect of manipulating the review space will be a lot wider, affecting any consumers who look up reviews of it. Keith (talk) 12:51, 23 February 2026 (UTC)