Non-fungible tokens

⚠️ Article status notice: This article has been marked as incomplete

This article needs additional work to meet the wiki's Content Guidelines and be in line with our Mission Statement for comprehensive coverage of consumer protection issues. In particular:

1. Needs some sources added, some replaced with more reputable sources
2. Potential section - Genericide - See discuss tab for details

This notice will be removed once the issue/s highlighted above have been addressed and sufficient documentation has been added to establish the systemic nature of these issues. Once you believe the article is ready to have its notice removed, visit the discord and post to the #appeals channel.

Learn more ▼

This Article Requires Additional Verification

---

This article has been flagged due to verification concerns. While the topic might have merit, the claims presented lack citations that live up to our standards, or rely on sources that are questionable or unverifiable by our standards. Articles must meet the Moderator Guidelines and Mission statement; factual accuracy and systemic relevance are required for inclusion here!

Why This Article Is In Question

---

Articles in this wiki are required to:

• Provide verifiable & credible evidence to substantiate claims.
• Avoid relying on anecdotal, unsourced, or suspicious citations that lack legitimacy.
• Make sure that all claims are backed by reliable documentation or reporting from reputable sources.

Examples of issues that trigger this notice:

• A topic that heavily relies on forum posts, personal blogs, or other unverifiable sources.
• Unsupported claims with no evidence or citations to back them up.
• Citations to disreputable sources, like non-expert blogs or sites known for spreading misinformation.

How You Can Improve This Article

---

To address verification concerns:

• Replace or supplement weak citations with credible, verifiable sources.
• Make sure that claims are backed by reputable reporting or independent documentation.
• Provide additional evidence to demonstrate systemic relevance and factual accuracy. For example:
  • Avoid: Claims based entirely on personal anecdotes or hearsay without supporting documentation.
  • Include: Corporate policies, internal communications, receipts, repair logs, verifiable video evidence, or credible investigative reports.

If you believe this notice has been placed in error, or once the article has been updated to address these concerns, please visit the #appeals channel on our Discord server: Join here.

Non-fungible tokens (also referred to as 'NFTs' or simply 'tokens') are a type of media centered around purely digital ownership backed through cryptocurrency infrastructure. Ownership of NFTs are however, reliant on the maintenance of the systems these tokens are designed for, and often due to either the usage of pump and dump schemes or neglect of these systems, ownership of these tokens becomes effectively useless, or worse, ownership of these NFTs are voided.

How it works

Non-fungible tokens are centered around a digital code that proves ownership over an image, and often cryptocurrency infrastructure, also referred to as the blockchain, handles the data behind who owns these codes. The most common cryptocurrency NFTs are associated with is Etherium, however later NFT projects would crop up with its own cryptocurrencies to handle the tokens.^{[citation needed]}

Why it is a problem

Fraud

Often, many NFTs are generated with the exclusive intent to generate revenue,^{[citation needed - check comment]} and as there are no regulations established within the NFT market, tokens can be minted fraudulently through various means.

Plagiarism

As there are a lack of measures to verify the authenticity of media ownership when minting NFTs, especially when these tokens are associated with its own custom cryptocurrency, there is a common pattern of these users claiming the content of others for the purposes of minting their own tokens. OpenSea's 'lazy minting' provides an easy model for malicious actors to freely mint these tokens and profit off of the effort of artists with zero financial investment. Alternatively, malicious actors could mint NFTs that are clones of the visual assets of existing tokens.

This lack of authenticity in minting tokens means that users may unwittingly invest in offending NFTs on platforms such as OpenSea and lose the token they paid for due to a DMCA from the author.

Pump-and-dump

Frequently, NFT projects, much like the cryptocurrencies that back them, will face pump-and-dump schemes, wherein the creator of the token, or a group of malicious actors, will attempt to inflate the value of the NFTs they own, and essentially scam users via tactics such as FOMO to have said users invest in tokens from the promoted collection, thus inflating the value of the product, before the actor(s) attempt to quickly dump the tokens they own onto the market, causing the value to quickly tank, harming all unaware parties in the process.

Ownership

NFTs can be associated with content beyond just a link to a JPEG file, such as items and cosmetics for games. However, despite the tokens themselves persisting on exchanges if they are minted with non-custom cryptocurrencies, users can be rugpulled, either intentionally or through neglect, and have the products they paid for as NFTs be rendered effectively useless. Particularly in the NFT gaming space, this introduces concerns with right to own, as companies such as Electronic Arts and Ubisoft attempt to produce NFT games, with some that end with excessively short lifespans and inflame the problems caused by predatory microtransactions.

Examples

This section is incomplete. This notice can be deleted once all the placeholder text has been replaced.

Some predatory examples of NFTs include:

• Frosties - A NFT game project which rug-pulled investors, and incurred $1.3M in fines from the DOJ.